According to my opinion ...
Official Secrets Act 1923 is the father of RTI act 2005 ,
According to Official Secrets Act 1923, RTI can only provide certain amount of information to the people.
Well about RTI , RTI needs a long term procedure, and the officials controlling this are the same officials working for that suspected Officer once or some maybe continuing to work, their is a series of chain, if the suspect is found guilty , the whole chain becomes guilty according to the law, RTI is good to get the information out , like to know how the system works in our high level of understanding but RTI is still not the best remedy to decide the Resignation. Filling an RTI is very easy , anyone can file it , but the complexity during RTI is again just a MIND GAME played by higher officials. Do you know why there is no RTI in Jammu and kashmir ??
And according to me RTI act doesnot promote transparency and but provides a little amount of accountability, how we can expect transparency if father of RTI , i.e, Official Secrets Act 1923 , is already present at the first place . ha ha ha...
by, tanakiron
The Right to Information Act 2005 (RTI) is an Act of the Parliament of India, passed by the UPA Government , in favor of the people of India.
It implements freedom of information legislation in India on a national level "to provide for setting out the practical regime of right to information for citizens."
The Act applies to all States and Union Territories of India, except the State of Jammu and Kashmir.
Under the provisions of the Act, any citizen may request information from a "public authority" (a body of Government or "instrumentality of State") which is required to reply expeditiously or within thirty days.
The Act also requires every public authority to computerize their records for wide dissemination and to proactively publish certain categories of information so that the citizens need minimum recourse to request for information formally.
This law was passed by Parliament on 15 June 2005 and came fully into force on 13 October 2005 . Information disclosure in India was hitherto restricted by the Official Secrets Act 1923 and various other special laws, which the new RTI Act now relaxes.
As far as the act is concerned, there is no hidden risk involved. Citizens are free to know from the Government authorities about any matter they wish to know
RTI was passed by Parliament on 15 June 2005
POSCO India was created on 2005-08-25.
No, Jaguar was owned by the Ford Motor Company in 2005.Tata of India did not take over until 2008.
Not Quite Right - 2005 was released on: USA: 5 January 2005 (DV Film Festival)
One Six Right - 2005 is rated/received certificates of: USA:G
what are the disadvantages of right to information act 2005 in india
2005
The Right to Information (RTI) Act came into force in India on October 12, 2005.
RTI was passed by Parliament on 15 June 2005
The Right to Information Act was passed in June 2005 in India in order to set up a structure whereby citizens can request (and receive) information in a consistent manner and a reasonable amount of time.
The Right to Information Act was passed in June 2005 in India in order to set up a structure whereby citizens can request (and receive) information in a consistent manner and a reasonable amount of time.
Right to information Act was passed in the Year is 2005
central government in india recently mode a law implement the right to workin 200aistricts in india.
There are 31 sections in the Right to Information (RTI) Act of 2005. These sections outline the provisions related to the right to information, requesting information from public authorities, obligations of public authorities, appeals, etc.
Showbiz India Xtreme - 2005 was released on: USA: 1 April 2005
The literacy rate for adults in India in 2011 was 74.04%. For youth in India, the literacy rate was 82%. For more information visit the Related Link.
Showbiz India Xtreme - 2005 2005-10-02 was released on: USA: 2 October 2005