· Allowing foreign players could destroy the livelihoods of millions of small store owners
· Market prices could be manipulated by foreign retail giants
· Local jobs could be at threat since the foreign players could purchase many products from abroad
· There is no established correlation between advent of FDI and improvement of a country's infrastructure
One factor affecting the FDI in India is their economic growth. Also, another factor affecting the FDI in India is their capital preservation.
poop
26%
Telecom sector has attracted most Foreign direct investment.
Cause whites are white they live different and have more money and food and more fancy stuff to build with and blacks are poor
The FDI coming in India is for short term. This is from series of retail chains.
yes..
Those opposing FDI in the retail sector argue that a large number of small and medium retail traders will lose their livelihood. But they forget one important thing - that there is no quality control over the goods we get from them. The consumers are at their mercy. Milk, edible oils, pulses and cereals are all adulterated. When retail giants of international repute enter the market, unscrupulous traders will either lose their business or have to assure quality
try doing some reseach on arguments against it then reverse it
There are no real, good arguments against planning. Having a plan is important in many cases.
Arguments against economic integration world leader command?
FDi magazine was created in 2001.
are you for or against voluntary work
There are many arguments for and against DNA evidence. One argument is that it cannot be disproved as deciding evidence.
The Full Form of FDI isForeign direct investment
Celibacy is abstinence from sex or sexual relations. There are arguments for it to protect people from unwanted pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases and religious purity. There are arguments against it saying that it is restrictive and that it goes against following the laws of nature.
"The evidence for evolution countervails over the arguments against it." THis means that evidence for evolution counteracts the arguments against it.