The British used their colonies in New Zealand and Australia primarily for agricultural development, resource extraction, and as penal colonies. Australia served as a destination for convicts, providing labor for the growing settlements, while both regions offered land for farming and access to valuable resources like wool, minerals, and timber. Additionally, these colonies were strategically important for expanding British influence in the Pacific region.
Great Britain was the nation that colonised both Australia and New Zealand for their resources. Colonising both countries enabled furred expansion of the British Empire, while their position in the South Pacific gave Great Britain a strategic presence in that part of the world.
Well for a start Australia & New Zealand are developed countries. Indonesia & Malaysia are developing countries. Australia & New Zealand is better than Indonesia & Malaysia in every aspect : economically, human rights , politcal stability , corruption, peace etc. The list goes on an on.
India and Hong Kong APEX :)
The British ruled directly over their colonies, while the French did not.
India and Hong Kong
What were New Zealand and Australia for the British
All Of The AboveApex
Great Britain was the nation that colonised both Australia and New Zealand for their resources. Colonising both countries enabled furred expansion of the British Empire, while their position in the South Pacific gave Great Britain a strategic presence in that part of the world.
Salutary neglect
Britain trained colonies for self-government - Apex
were not represented in the british parliament
(Apex) They provided British factories with raw materials.
Britain trained colonies for self-government - Apex
British colonies had more people, but French colonies held more land.-APEX
Australia for Pakeha and the Cook Islands for Maori.
Asia! APEX :DD
(Apex) They provided British factories with raw materials.