There isn't any real empirical evidence for the Big Bang. However, there are lots of stray facts and some interpretations of possibilities that seem to indicate that something like a "big bang" may have occurred.
But the big bang isn't a "fact"; it happened, or PROBABLY happened, about 14 billion years ago, and nobody was around to take video of it. There are a great number of knowns that sort-of correlate with the big bang hypothesis, and a fair number of knowns that run counter to it. Anybody who thinks that the Big Bang is some sort of Absolute Truth is likely to be severely disappointed when new facts come to light that cause the concept to be revised a little - or a lot!
Al Gore was an idiot; the "science" is NEVER "settled", and anybody who claims that "the science is settled" knows nothing about science. The future will be filled with wonders that we can hardly guess at now.
It is important evidence of the Big Bang.
It is quite clear, from observations, that the Universe is expanding, and that it started from a very hot and very dense start, currently called the "Big Bang". It is not quite clear where the energy came from; there are several speculations about this, but there is not much evidence about what happened before the Big Bang - or whether there even was a "before".
The 'big bang' theory.
The Big Bang Theory is set in Pasadena California.
Researchers found the "cosmic microwave background radiation", which is a heat imprint left over from the big bang. The redshift of light emitted by most galaxies indicates the universe is expanding.
No, it's the other way round. The Big Bang is responsible for the redshift.
The red shift doesn't just indicate that there is evidence for the Big Bang theory: the Hubble red shift is evidence supporting the Big Bang theory.
3:1
the big bang occured
The red shift and the cosmic microwave background radiation was the evidence used to develop the big bang theory.
no the no. of stars in the milky way is not the evidence in support of the big bang cosmology.
They didn't; the big bang theory is just an idea or a theory, not a fact. The empirical evidence that our Universe was, 13.7 billion years ago, much more dense that it is now, is overwhelming. No other explanation even begins to explain what we observe in our Universe. Saying the Big Bang is a "just an idea or theory" is like saying gravity is "just an idea or a theory, not a fact."
yes it will happen again after the big crunch then of course, the big munch..... At present there is no evidence that another Big Bang will occur.
He doesn't
edwin hubble
Humanists typically believe in scientific explanations for the creation of the world, such as the theory of evolution and the Big Bang theory. They focus on rational thinking and empirical evidence rather than religious or supernatural beliefs.
It is not so much that the universe is expanding, but rather the rationalization for its expansion that provides evidence to support the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang supports interpreted observational evidence of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) barrier that there is an evolutionary expansion of the universe which promotes a finite age for the universe.