answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

There isn't any real empirical evidence for the Big Bang. However, there are lots of stray facts and some interpretations of possibilities that seem to indicate that something like a "big bang" may have occurred.

But the big bang isn't a "fact"; it happened, or PROBABLY happened, about 14 billion years ago, and nobody was around to take video of it. There are a great number of knowns that sort-of correlate with the big bang hypothesis, and a fair number of knowns that run counter to it. Anybody who thinks that the Big Bang is some sort of Absolute Truth is likely to be severely disappointed when new facts come to light that cause the concept to be revised a little - or a lot!

Al Gore was an idiot; the "science" is NEVER "settled", and anybody who claims that "the science is settled" knows nothing about science. The future will be filled with wonders that we can hardly guess at now.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is a piece of empirical evidence for the big bang?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Is the red-shift responsible for the big bang theory?

No, it's the other way round. The Big Bang is responsible for the redshift.


How might the redshift indicate there is evidence for the big bang theory?

The red shift doesn't just indicate that there is evidence for the Big Bang theory: the Hubble red shift is evidence supporting the Big Bang theory.


The hydrogen-to-helium ratio is an important piece of evidence for the big bang What is the minimum hydrogen-to-helium ratio observed?

3:1


Background radiation detected in space is believed to be evidence that?

the big bang occured


What evidence was used to develop the big bang theory?

The red shift and the cosmic microwave background radiation was the evidence used to develop the big bang theory.


Is the number of stars in the Milky Way Galaxy evidence in support of Big Bang Cosmology?

no the no. of stars in the milky way is not the evidence in support of the big bang cosmology.


How do they know the big bang theory happend?

They didn't; the big bang theory is just an idea or a theory, not a fact. The empirical evidence that our Universe was, 13.7 billion years ago, much more dense that it is now, is overwhelming. No other explanation even begins to explain what we observe in our Universe. Saying the Big Bang is a "just an idea or theory" is like saying gravity is "just an idea or a theory, not a fact."


When will big bang two will happen?

yes it will happen again after the big crunch then of course, the big munch..... At present there is no evidence that another Big Bang will occur.


If God exists why is there no evidence of him And yet there is a mountain of evidence for Evolution and the Big Bang?

He doesn't


Who gave evidence of the big bang theory?

edwin hubble


How do humanists believe the world was created?

Humanists typically believe in scientific explanations for the creation of the world, such as the theory of evolution and the Big Bang theory. They focus on rational thinking and empirical evidence rather than religious or supernatural beliefs.


How does expanding universe provide evidence for big bang theory?

It is not so much that the universe is expanding, but rather the rationalization for its expansion that provides evidence to support the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang supports interpreted observational evidence of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) barrier that there is an evolutionary expansion of the universe which promotes a finite age for the universe.