$25,000.00
The fault lines closest to Canada's west coast include the Cascadia Subduction Zone, where the Juan de Fuca Plate is subducting beneath the North American Plate. This zone is capable of producing large earthquakes, including the potential for a megathrust earthquake. Other notable faults in the region include the San Andreas Fault system to the south and various strike-slip faults in British Columbia, such as the Queen Charlotte Fault. These geological features pose significant seismic risks to coastal communities.
Oh, dude, the average height of a fault block mountain is like, totally variable. It really depends on the specific mountain and how much tectonic activity has been going on. So, like, there's no set number I can give you, but you can expect them to be pretty tall and majestic, you know?
A fault is where to tectonic plates meet but a fault zone is the area around a fault.
The San Andreas Fault is the fault line is South America.
"A wiring fault" which - depending on the actual behavior of the bad connection - might also be described as "an intermittent fault", "a high resistance fault", or a combination of all three terms. For example: "An intermittent, high resistance wiring fault".
The settlement would depend on the situation. If it is from a auto accident the settlement would depend on the limits of the at fault driver of the limit on the under of uninsured limits of the non fault driver.
Amount of settlement is dependent on how much damage has occurred, and who was listed at fault on the police report.
you shouldnt settle for less than 500,00.00..i got more but i had the company by the balls ,the driver was completely at fault.
Nothing in this post constitutes legal advice. Georgia generally applies a modified comparative negligence approach in apportioning fault in negligence actions. A plaintiff can recover his damages from a negligent defendant discounted by the plaintiff's percentage of fault; however, when the plaintiff's fault is greater than the defendant's the plaintiff cannot recover. So, where a plaintiff's injuries amount to $100,000, and the plaintiff is found to be 30% at fault and the defendant 70%, the plaintiff can recover in the amount of $70,000. If the plaintiff were 51% at fault and the defendant 49%, the plaintiff would recover nothing. Although Last Clear Chance is a doctrine more commonly associated with contributory negligence jurisdictions (where any negligence on the part of the plaintiff is a complete bar to recovery), Georgia preserves it and applies it both to the plaintiff and the defendant. Notwithstanding the comparative negligence rule discussed above, if a plaintiff, through the exercise of reasonable care, could have avoided the consequences of the defendant's prior negligence but failed to do so, he will be completely barred from recovery, regardless of the defendant's percentage of fault. Conversely, even though a plaintiff's negligence contributes to the incident, if the defendant had the last clear chance to avoid harm, but failed to do so because he did not exercise reasonable care, the defendant can be held liable to the full extent of plaintiff's damages (i.e., not discounted for plaintiff's degree of fault).
The most popular form of comparative negligence in the US is the "modified comparative negligence with a 50% bar rule." Under this rule, a plaintiff can only recover damages if their degree of fault is less than the defendant's fault. If the plaintiff is found to be equally or more at fault than the defendant (50% or more), they are barred from recovering damages.
The fair amount due for your injury. In a no fault or PIP state your coverage/policy pays you much eclipse the thresold before a settlement is available.
I need to submit a request for disclosure by defendant form to a title company to prevent a lawsuit for something that was not my fault. Where can I find this form or do I just submit documentation saying I am not liable for what they are suing me for?
If the defendant does not show up in small claims court, the judge may enter a default judgment in favor of the plaintiff. This means that the plaintiff wins the case by default since the defendant did not appear to defend themselves. The plaintiff may then be awarded the relief requested in their claim.
NO, They are not liable if their insured was not at fault or was not their insured regardless of whether a check had already been written or not. In fact should they have issued a settlement check and later determined they were not liable, The insurer can demand a refund of the settlement amount they issued.
Yes, you can infact obtain a cash settlement after a car accident. Once a party is found at fault and proper court proceedings have been gone through a cash settlement can be obtained
No. In an injury case, the plaintiff must show how the defendant was responsible for the injuries. Since, in this case, you say the injury was the contractor's fault, you would have no liability.
There is really no "average" fault because all of the fault lines on the earth join together. There are names for different sections of the fault lines, most notably the one in the Pacific Ocean called the mid-Pacific oceanic ridge.