war horse or immortals
In the middle of the 19th century, the primary socioeconomic classes in the South included wealthy plantation owners, yeoman farmers, poor whites, and enslaved people. However, a distinct middle class, as understood in modern terms, was not well-established in the South at that time. The region's economy was largely dominated by agriculture and slavery, which limited the emergence of a robust middle class. Additionally, there were few urban centers that could foster a diverse range of professions typical of a middle class.
farmers
Farmers in the North faced several disadvantages compared to their Southern counterparts, primarily due to the region's harsher climate and shorter growing season, which limited crop diversity and yields. Additionally, the soil quality in many Northern areas was less fertile for cash crops like cotton and tobacco. Furthermore, the North's focus on industrialization often meant less investment in agriculture, leading to fewer resources and infrastructure for farmers. Lastly, the absence of a large labor force, particularly enslaved labor, restricted agricultural expansion compared to the South.
They allowed farmers to band together against railroads and business interests
Most farmers actually lived in the south.
Plantation
Enslaved Africans were important to farmers because they provided cheap labor for plantation work, such as planting and harvesting crops like cotton, tobacco, and sugar. Their forced labor contributed to the profitability of large agricultural operations in the Americas.
arent plantation owners farmers?
Farmers without enslaved people were typically called free farmers or tenant farmers. These individuals would either own their land or rent it from a landlord in order to cultivate crops or raise livestock.
Yeoman farmers typically did not own other farmers; instead, they were small-scale landowners who cultivated their own land. They often worked independently and may have employed a few laborers or family members, but they were distinct from plantation owners who relied on enslaved labor. Yeoman farmers valued their independence and were often seen as the backbone of agrarian society in the United States, particularly in the 18th and 19th centuries.
A yeoman was a small landowner or farmer who owned and cultivated their land independently, while a plantation owner typically owned large estates worked by enslaved laborers, producing cash crops like tobacco or cotton. Yeoman farmers usually lived on their land, while plantation owners often resided elsewhere and supervised operations remotely.
They grew beans, onions, lettuce, cucumbers, and spice plants.
Sharecropping replaced the plantation system in the South following the Civil War. It became a common arrangement where landless farmers would work on land owned by others in exchange for a share of the crops they produced, often leading to cycles of debt and dependency. This system emerged in response to the loss of enslaved labor after emancipation.
The most important social distinction in the seventeenth century Chesapeake colony was between the wealthy elite plantation owners and the indentured servants and enslaved laborers. The plantation owners had immense wealth and power, while the indentured servants and enslaved laborers were largely dependent on them for work and survival. This distinction shaped the economic and social structure of the colony, with the plantation owners dominating both politically and economically.
Farmers Markets. All states have them. Go online to Google search and query FARMERS MARKETS ...YOUR STATE...
Plantation owners.
The slaves were enslaved while the others were not.