answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Movies & Television

What did Paul Robeson testified before the House Un American Activities Committee?

Racial inequality was against American principles (APEX 2021)


What was Paul Robeson's point in testifying before the house in American activities committee?

That racial inequality was against American principles ~ apex


In Texas can a 17-year-old move out of her parents' home and live with the father of her baby?

You can if your parents take you to the courthouse and say that they are giving you all legal rights to be an adult, and if they won't you are old enough to go there and say you want to move out, but you have to go to court and get a lawyer it's a mess, i did the same thing with my girlfriend.


Why is chemical warfare a crime against humanity?

Chemical warfare is considered a crime against humanity because it inflicts indiscriminate suffering and devastation on civilian populations, violating fundamental human rights and ethical norms. The use of toxic agents can cause severe and prolonged physical and psychological harm, often affecting vulnerable groups such as children and the elderly. Additionally, chemical weapons can lead to long-term environmental damage and destabilization of communities, undermining the principles of humanity and dignity. International treaties, like the Chemical Weapons Convention, reflect the global consensus against such inhumane practices.


Compare 1.5 Mbps 384 Kbps FIOS to cable for internet speed?

When comparing be sure to read all the fine print. Somewhere imbedded in all the hype about upload/download speeds for most every internet provider will be the words "up to". One seldom gets the full 'rated speed' but rather anything between nothing and the highest number. There is no recourse against the IP provider as they will point out those two silly words "up to" and send you on your way.

Related Questions

Is the purpose of tort law to punish criminal wrongdoers?

No, the purpose of tort law is not to punish criminal wrongdoers. Tort law is a civil law that aims to provide compensation to individuals who have been wronged by others' negligent or intentional actions. Criminal law is concerned with punishing those who commit crimes against society.


What is no recourse?

"No Recourse" means there is no positive legal action available. It is the lack of the right to obtain a judgment against or reimbursement from, a defaulting or opposing party.


Do you have any recourse against a dealer who offers incentives a week after you purchase a car?

No.


What recourse do benefiers have if the executor does not distribute the funds?

File a lawsuit against the executor for not following the law.


Can you sue someone for libel and seek legal recourse for damages caused by false and defamatory statements made against you?

Yes, you can sue someone for libel if they have made false and defamatory statements against you, and seek legal recourse for damages caused by those statements.


How would you use principles in a sentence?

To answer you goes against all my principles. No school principal can be completely without principles. Where are your principles?


If a collection agency repossesses something they had no legitimate claim to what legal recourse do you have against the company?

sue them for "conversion".


What was paul robeson's point in testifying before the house un-America activities committee?

That racial inequality was against American principles ~ apex


How nationalization of foreigners property is against Principles of International Law?

The usual principle is that private property owned by a foreign person within the jurisdiction of a sovereign may not be taken by the sovereign without due process of law and reasonable compensation to the owner.


Why did American anti imperalist league condemn imperialism?

the league argued that Imperialism went against American principles.


Is there any kind of legal recourse for the victim of a sociopath?

i don't think so, unless you did something against the law.


Does the person who has the injunction against them have any recourse or what if the accusations are false?

Yes, a person with an injunction against them has recourse to challenge the injunction in court. They can present evidence to dispute the accusations and argue for its dismissal. If the allegations are false, they may also consider pursuing a defamation claim against the accuser, depending on the circumstances. It's advisable for them to seek legal counsel to navigate the situation effectively.