he's innocent because he doesn't know what his fathers job is .
Bruno's mom.
In Chapter 4 of "The Boy in the Striped Pajamas," the stark contrast between Bruno's sheltered life and the grim realities of the concentration camp is evident. This chapter highlights Bruno's innocence and ignorance about the true nature of his father's job and the world around him. His naive curiosity about the "people in the striped pajamas" symbolizes the broader themes of innocence lost and the consequences of blind obedience to authority. Ultimately, it sets the stage for the tragic friendship that develops between Bruno and Shmuel, underscoring the innocence of childhood amidst the horrors of war.
It's a book and movie about a 9 year old boy (Bruno) who moves to Auschwitz with his family because his Father is the Commandant. At Auschwitz, Bruno meets a Jewish boy named Shmuel who lives in a concentration camp.
In "The Boy in the Striped Pajamas," the theme of discovery is illustrated through the innocent friendship between Bruno, a young boy, and Shmuel, a Jewish boy in a concentration camp. As Bruno explores his new surroundings, he uncovers the harsh realities of the Holocaust, challenging his naive understanding of the world. This journey of discovery reveals the stark contrasts between their lives and ultimately highlights the tragic consequences of prejudice and ignorance. Bruno's innocent quest for friendship serves as a poignant reminder of the innocence lost amidst the horrors of war.
In "The Boy in the Striped Pajamas," Bruno displays immaturity through his naive perspective and lack of understanding of the world around him. He often acts without considering the consequences of his actions, such as when he explores the fence surrounding the concentration camp without understanding its significance. His simplistic view of friendship and the events happening around him showcases his inability to grasp the complexities of human relationships and the harsh realities of war. This immaturity ultimately highlights the tragic innocence of childhood amidst such profound horrors.
Bruno's mom.
It's a book and movie about a 9 year old boy (Bruno) who moves to Auschwitz with his family because his Father is the Commandant. At Auschwitz, Bruno meets a Jewish boy named Shmuel who lives in a concentration camp.
Naive and innocent. Young. Smart. Opinionated. Immature.
No, Bruno is not as naive as Schueml. Bruno is more experienced and knowledgeable than Schueml, and is less likely to be taken advantage of or fooled.
Bruno is naive. He doesn't exactly know what's going on around him. In the movie after Bruno sees the propaganda film, he is thinking about joining the Nazis side. But with his teacher and Gretel telling him one thing, and Pavel and Shmuel acting totally different. Both Shmuel and Pavel are nice, and nothing like what everyone is telling him Jews are like. Towards the end, he questions his fathers morales. Jews obviously aren't as bad as everyone says.
Bruno is very timid and shy. He is also very naive and has no self confidence. At the end of the film Bruno shows he is a loyal and is trustworthy. In part of the film Bruno also shows a negative side to his personality as he lies to a German soldier as to why his Jewish freind Shmuel is Eating in the house. Although this has happened Shmuel forgives Bruno and Eagerley accepts Bruno's invitation of help.
:P I have the same assignment but i'll help you too! Bruno is joyful in the begining because he's playing the helicopter with his friends but when he leaves them to go move out he is feeling depressed!
The fact that they have at all no clue what is going on around them.And how dangerous it is to even know each other in this time.
The main difference is that Bruno is a German and Shmuel is Jewish. This causes Bruno to live a rather comfortable life in an actual house, while Shmuel is forced to live in the crowded huts of the Auschwitz concentration camp. Bruno is also naive and doesn't know what's going on while Shmuel does.
His naive nature was the reason of his failure. Naive is the word used in this sentence.
The use of a 9 year old boy's perspective is crucial to the story. An adult in the same situation would immediately know who the people were, what the place was, why they were there - and what would ultimately happen to them. A 9 year old with fanciful imagination and childhood innocence, bored of his lessons and out for a wander, however, knows virtually nothing about them, save that "they are Jews, and we are the opposite". This makes no difference to him - like saying they are from this street and we are from this one - so he simply sees the boy in the striped pyjamas as a new friend to make, and of course his innocence and naivete leads him to the events in the novel's conclusion.
Naive