In the US, I can't think of one that comes immediately to mind. As a matter of fact, juveniles actually enjoy more, and better, protection in the court process than adults do, and are treated more leniently besides.
In McKeiver v. Pennsylvania, (1971) the Court ruled the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial does not extend to juvenile court proceedings, because the intent of the juvenile justice system is to rehabilitate, and a jury trial creates a more adversarial environment that can undermine that goal.
In 1971, no states offered jury trials in juvenile court. As of 2009, ten states grant the right of juveniles to jury trials, and another eleven states allow jury trials under limited circumstances.
Often, US Supreme Court decisions follow trends in state courts. At some point in the not-too-distant future, the Court may extend 6th Amendment protection to children and teens.
Laws vary by state, and depending on what the crime was, but in general, yes, juveniles can be tried as adults if the juvenile court certifies them as an adult and transfers the case to criminal court.
Juveniles possess several constitutional rights, including the right to due process under the 14th Amendment, the right to counsel, and protection against cruel and unusual punishment under the 8th Amendment. However, their rights can be limited in certain contexts, such as in school settings where they may have reduced protections against searches and seizures. Additionally, while they have the right to remain silent, the standards for waiving this right can differ from those applicable to adults. Overall, juveniles are afforded rights, but these can be subject to different interpretations and applications compared to adults.
I think they are housed in adult jail and prison
In Re Gault
Set a precedent that juveniles can not be tried and acquitted in juvenile court then tried again in "adult" criminal court. Basically, the constitutional protection from double jeopardy applies to juveniles as well as adults.
Juvenile because juveniles aren't charged as badly as adults.
Laws vary by state, and depending on what the crime was, but in general, yes, juveniles can be tried as adults if the juvenile court certifies them as an adult and transfers the case to criminal court.
voting. 18+ only
Their "rights" are the same as that of any other citizen. As juveniles, they do have some PRIVILEGES though. One is not be tried in "adult" court - and to be more leniently trreated because of their age - and to be incarcerated in less restrictive conditions than adult prisoners.
The likely word is the plural noun "juveniles" (non-adults, or teenagers).
Well, If
The concept you are referring to is known as the age of majority or age of consent. It is the age at which a person is considered a legal adult and is granted certain rights and responsibilities. Laws regarding running away from home may differ for adults and juveniles, as juveniles are generally under the legal custody and protection of their parents or guardians.
I think they are housed in adult jail and prison
Their "rights" are the same as that of any other citizen. As juveniles, they do have some PRIVILEGES though. One is not be tried in "adult" court - and to be more leniently trreated because of their age - and to be incarcerated in less restrictive conditions than adult prisoners.
The best way is to not commit a crime.
I believe the questioner is confusing the term "rights" with "treatment of." Both juveniles and adults possess the same "rights" but the way in which the juvenile offenders acts are written afford much more lenient treatment to juveniles, as opposed to adults charged with identical offenses. This is in an effort to take a wayward juvenile offender who may have made a mis-step due to youth and inexperience, and genltly guide them onto a more law-abiding path.
Before the In re Gault case in 1967, juvenile court proceedings were often informal and lacked the due process protections afforded to adults. Juveniles could be detained without proper legal representation, and their rights to a fair hearing were not guaranteed. The landmark decision established that juveniles have the right to counsel, the right to confront witnesses, and the right to a fair hearing, significantly transforming the juvenile justice system to better protect the rights of young individuals. This marked a shift towards recognizing juveniles as individuals deserving of legal protections similar to adults.