There would be no written laws.
We wouldn't have any freedom of speech or religion.
The country will be like a vehicle without engine and wheels.
if there is no written constitution any one can rebel and bittery . any individual country can be formed. thereia no right to speech and freedom.
if there was no constitution of India we would have no fundamental rights for education, right to speak etc....
the world will end
India would look like USA,UK with much less poverty . Our leaders were over-confident and now india sucks to the core
The Tennis Court Oath was when the national assembly would not disband the tenis court until they had a new constitution. This happened and was called the Constitution of 1791. It was the first written constitution of France. There was still a king but the national assembly made the laws. Only men over 25 could vote but its main significance was that it was the first written constitution of France.
Africa is a continent, not a country. There are over 50 countries in Africa, some of which have their own constitutions. So it would not make sense or be practical to have a single constitution for the whole continent.
(note: this explanation assumes understanding of several U.S. landmark cases) Judicial activism is closely tied with the personal standpoint of "liberal." It is basically being more "activist" or more in turn with "adding" to the U.S. Constitution rather than merely interpreting it (judicial restraint). Three major cases that have been touted as judicial activism abuse include Roe v. Wade, Lawrence v. Texas, and Brown v. Board of Education (abortion, homosexuality, and racial segregation, respectively). Without judicial activism, the U.S. would still be stuck with the Dredd Scott decision and Plessy v. Ferguson, regarding African Americans' rights. Without judicial activism, Lochner v. New York would stand as a legal precendent, and the minimum wage would be illegal on the basis that it violates the right to business contracts. Additionally, it could be argued that judicial activism is necessary because it is difficult to decide court cases based on the U.S. Constitution when the framers' are long dead, their intent unknown, and the Constitution written in an age before the modern or digital age.
Britain would have had the biggest influence in India.
The constitution is the framework of government. If there was framework it would be confusing because no one would know how things are done or what to do.
The answer is simple............... the india will be finished
qd
It is possible to follow generally established principles of pedagogy without necessarily having a constitution for a school. If it is a private school, it would also be governed by principles of business administration. Lots of people run businesses without having a constitution for their business. And if it is a public school, then it is run by a political entity which has its own constitution.
the land would dry crops would die and india would very hot in tempuature.
The country would go to war
If India did not make indpendence they would be the worst thing happen to the Asia goods and cloths have been exported from India to other Asian coutries and Pakistan and Bangladesh would not be build India would face very bad loss and they could not export there product because all would be taken by the britishers
I prefer a preserved written Constitution for a Republic. Also, a Constitution written on ricepaper and doused with raspberry culi would be good, as long as the whole country wasn't run by media corporations :)
They were written to explain the Constitution to the representatives who would be voting on it. It is the best source in understanding what the Constitution means.
The U.S. Constitution trumps any conflicts with state constitutions.
Do you mean, "Why did they create the Constitution?" or, "Why was the Constitution written down?" For "Why did they create the Constitution?", because the Founding Fathers realized that the Articles of Confederation were not stable enough. The United States needed a stronger federal government. For "Why was the Constitution written down?", so that if any changes were necessary, it would be easy, and also so that we wouldn't have to memorize the Constitution. If it had been strictly memory, the Constitution would have died with Jefferson and all those at the Constitutional Convention.
India would look like USA,UK with much less poverty . Our leaders were over-confident and now india sucks to the core