0
The U.S. should consider intervening in the affairs of Another Country when there is a clear threat to national security, significant human rights violations, or the potential for regional instability that could impact global peace. Intervention should ideally be based on international consensus, such as through the United Nations, and involve a well-defined strategy with clear objectives. Additionally, the U.S. should weigh the potential consequences and effectiveness of intervention, ensuring that it aligns with both ethical considerations and long-term stability.
What else can I help you with?
Should brain drain be banned?
Brain drain occurs when highly qualified people are sent to another country. If reciprocation from the exchanging countries occurs, there is no reason to ban brain drain.
Should India being a developing country hold the Commonwealth Games?
it should not be held in India as the country will be embarrased due the corruption here.............
Will there be another wild hogs movie?
I think there should be another movie because it was funny entertaining and i feel like there is a cliffhanger at the end of it so i think there should be another one!:)
How long can a US citizen minor stay out of the us?
It makes no difference how long a US citizen of ANY age is out of the country. "Once a US Citizen, always a US Citizen." -UNLESS- you renounce your US citizenship and become a citizen of another country. However, since the question is about a 'minor' child that eventuality should not arise.
Is Canada a real country?
No, a nation should be a union of people, not beavers. Therefore Canada is not a real country.
Why did roosevelt not help in the holocaust?
Roosevelt did not believe that the United States should intervene in the internal affairs of another country
Does a country have the right to intervene in the affairs of another country?
Generally, countries should respect the sovereignty of other nations and refrain from intervening in their internal affairs. However, in some cases, such as humanitarian crises or violations of international law, the international community may consider intervention to protect human rights or restore peace and security, following established legal and ethical principles.
When should a country become involved in the affairs of another country?
If they are in alliance with one of them and is asked for help, or if the situation threatens global/regional safety.
When is a country allowed to intervene in another country's affairs?
In general, most countries follow the rules of international law and diplomacy which require that no country interferes in the affairs of another. Not at all. Ever. But there are exceptions. Particularly if one rogue country is breaking the rules itself and invading another or causing harm to another. In such cases there are international courts which should be approached for rulings, as well as the United Nations. If such courts and the UN decide to take action, it is usually graduated action, slowly ramping up through through diplomatic approaches, trade embargoes, total blockades and eventually armed intervention - also called War. There is also an exemption considered under humanitarian law, allthough not binding, that considers the case when the population or large sectors of the population of a country are at risk of life because of lack of centralized government or lack of action from a central government. In such extraordinary situation, a non military action may be taken by a coalition of at least two countries under the supervision of the United Nations for relief or evacuation purposes. An extreme danger to the nationals of a foreign country who have residence or are in transit in a given country, may also grant a rapid intervention from their country of origin or citizenship, with the exclusive purpose and limitation of evacuation. Nevertheless, the above are extraordinary exceptions that may cause further instability or unwelcome consequences, hence the primary international binding to the requirement that no country may interfere in the affairs of another at any time.
Both the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans believed that the country should?
Stay out of foreign affairs
Both the federalist and the democratic republicans believed that the country should?
Stay out of foreign affairs.
What should you do if you are apprehended by or become involved with Korean law enforcement authorities?
A resident should know what to do in their own country. If you are a foreigner in the country, contact your consulate and ask them to intervene or provide support.
Who cares about laissez-faire?
Well we all care about something. There are those who believe that government should intervene as little as possible in the direction of economic affairs. There are those who believe that the practice of noninterference in the affairs of others, especially with reference to individual conduct or freedom of action.
Why no country should interfere in the affairs of another?
Interfering in another country's affairs can violate its sovereignty and lead to conflict or instability. It can also be seen as imposing one's own values rather than respecting the autonomy and self-determination of that nation. International relations are based on principles of mutual respect and non-interference to ensure peace and cooperation among nations.
Can you ignore your husbands affair?
no. no affairs should be ignored. if he is having an affair with another women then that is unsuitable and should be resolved
Should people who witness bullying intervene?
Yes, bystanders should intervene. Having someone just standing around will not help the situation.
Can you give me any comments about laissez faire?
1. the theory or system of government that upholds the autonomous character of the economic order, believing that government should intervene as little as possible in the direction of economic affairs. 2. the practice or doctrine of noninterference in the affairs of others, esp. with reference to individual conduct or freedom of action.
