answersLogoWhite

0

It was and remains far more then two rival groups, the Hutu and the Tutsi trying for control in a vacumn left by Belgian withdrawal. The Tutsi were the first to suffer actual genocide. The Hutu had suffered for years under Tutsi domination and Belgium was slow to respond and may have shown a degree of favoritism to the Tutsi who had been their figurehead leadership in the Colonial era. The Catholic Church must also assume some responsibility for failing to provide leadership. The United Naions is equally to blame for its slow response. The aggressors appeared on both sides of the fray as did the victims. Rwanda was unprepared for the responsibility of genuine self government which they wanted and deserved.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Who were the aggressors in the Rwanda genocide?

The Hutus


What race was the victim of Rwanda's Genocide?

The Tutsis were the victims.


What happened to the victims of the Rwanda genocide?

They were hacked to death with machetes.


Why do you think people allowed the Holocaust to occur?

Fear. Even though the victims outnumbered the aggressors, they were scared.


What will happen if the aggressors are not stopped?

If the aggressors are not stopped, they may continue their harmful behavior unchecked, leading to further harm, escalation of conflict, and potentially more victims suffering. It is important to intervene promptly to prevent further negative consequences.


Who were the People murdered during the 1994 mass genocide in rwanda?

The victims were the Tutsi tribe.


Why do police turn some true victims of physical abuse into aggressors who have to defend themselves?

Please re-word this question and re-submit. It makes no sense.


Were the Hutus or tutsis the protagonist in the rwanda genocide?

The tutsis were the victims, so if I understand the question they were the protagonists and the Hutus were the antagonists.


What would happen if the aggressors were no stopped?

If the aggressors were not stopped, they could continue their harmful actions, potentially causing further damage, harm, or conflict. Lack of intervention could lead to escalation of the situation and more severe consequences for the victims. It is essential to intervene and address aggression to prevent further harm.


Who were the aggressors in the war that is discussed in Zlatas Diary?

Bosnian Serbs were the aggressors.


Who were the aggressors in the war that is discussed in zlata diary?

Bosnian Serbs were the aggressors.


Did the Japanese admit their guilt as aggressors in World War 2 and to what extent?

Theu really never have. As I understand it, their history textbooks to this day present them as innocent victims who were forced by circumstances into the war. Michael Montagne