Directive Principles of State Policy in India are considered non-justiciable because they are guidelines for the state to formulate policies and laws, rather than enforceable rights. They are designed to ensure social and economic justice, but they lack legal binding force, meaning individuals cannot approach the courts for their enforcement. This distinction allows the government flexibility in implementing these principles according to available resources and circumstances. However, they serve as a fundamental framework for governance and can influence judicial interpretation of laws.
. Parliament, supported by more than fifty percent of states……………
orhanisation of village panchayat
k. m. munshi
United India as it is based on principles not specific race, ethnicity or sex. Principles which are applicable to all whether indian or not.
finance commission
Directive principles
members of rajya sabha
conclusion of directive principles of state policy
The directive principles of state policy was adopted from England. These are principles in which the British Constitution was written.
economic justice has been incorporated in the constitution of India under directive principles of State Policy...
Answer
Shariful Hasan has written: 'Supreme Court, fundamental rights and directive principles' -- subject(s): Civil rights, India, India. Supreme Court
Fundamental rights are justiciable where as directive principles are not justiciable. The provision of directive priciple thus cannot be enforced in court of law.
Bassically, your nan got hit by a car
British Constitution
There exist many differences. The most important being that the fundamental rights can be enforced by a court of law (against the state), while Directive Principles are not. Fundamental rights are inalienabe rights, whereas Directive Principles are aimed at securing welfare, which are more like constitutional guidelines.
fundamental right are concerned with the citizens while directive principle is concerned with the state..