Want this question answered?
That is a matter of opinion, some people think it hurts children's self-esteem, others think it is a form of discipline. I think parents should be allowed to smack their children, enough to hurt and teach them what they are doing is wrong, but not so much as to take belts and spoons and smack their children so much that they bleed.
Because children are normally around there parents for their whole lives so they become similar to their parents. Also it could be something in the genes.
First would be spouse. If no spouse, then children If no spouse or children, then parents If no spouse, children or parents, then siblings. If no spouse, children, parents or siblings, then nieces and nephews. If none of the above, then the next relative in line. (Grandparent, aunt, uncle, cousin and so on.)
The moral is to give parents excuse to ignore their children by saying: it not so good to have perfect parents, it can be a disaster if you are not satisfied with your parents, so bear with your parents no matter what they do to you!
Yes, I think so. I don't have the book at hand, but if I remember correctly, the children were sent away by their parents to the professor's home, for their protection. The book takes place during World War II, and the kids are English. At that time, Great Britain and especially London was under heavy bombing by the Nazis, so a lot of parents sent their children away someplace safer.
The kids were fighting alot
to keep them happy, so that they would not create so much of a fuss when they were experimented on.
That depends on how crazy or how much their parents are. There are so many reasons for this.
Because teachers are sadists.
Yes very much so because children want to be like their parents when they grow up
So What the Fuss was created in 2005.
Parents are completely responsible for their children's wellbeing, so it's parents to children.
yes lots of parents are stressed because of children so they argue a lot
Maybe it is possible that the children are spoiled. Since the parents love them so much, they can give everything the kids want to make them happy, and I think parents can't bear to see their kids sad. Maybe the child or children grew up and still demanded more things but couldn't get them. That's my theory.
Most parents are not so much embarrassed about telling their children how they were born, but apprehensive as to how much they should go into detail depending on the age of the child. There are a few parents who simply do not like to discuss sexual matters with their children, but, in schools or from their peers children will soon find out. It is far better for parents to decide just how much their children should know and tell them the truth rather than to hear uneducated guesses from the child's friends or others.
That is a matter of opinion, some people think it hurts children's self-esteem, others think it is a form of discipline. I think parents should be allowed to smack their children, enough to hurt and teach them what they are doing is wrong, but not so much as to take belts and spoons and smack their children so much that they bleed.
Parents need authority over children because they are there to guide a child so they can grow up. Children can not earn a living, know how to do things, and can not know how to live in the world. It takes many years to learn these things.