It is actually on the border of being a less developed and a more developed country -- being the most developed country in the whole of Africa with an infrastructure that is often comparable with those in more developed countries. But there is a huge disparity between the living standards of the rich, mostly in the cities, and the millions from the rural areas or those masses who have accumulated in informal settlements around the cities. On the whole, the majority do not reap the benefits of a welfare state, to say the very least.
it is an LEDC
It is a LEDC country.
Less Economically Developed Country means ledc. So your answer is infact yes it is a ledc place by Sophie louise court
Sudan in general is an LEDC but there so many places that you can say is more developing however Sudan is known as and LEDC as it is in poverty and is in civil war.
India is a LEDC (Less Economically Developed Country). It has many economic development problems. Some of those problems are similar to the problems of Brazil and Kenya. Those problems: Low life expectancy, High-birth rates etc
no IT IS NOT because of the food and lack of water
Not much because its a LEDC country
LEDC
In Less Developed Countries (LEDC), such as Africa, India, Bangladesh and so on.
Mumbai is a ledc.
yes, this is because it is cheaper for him to manufacture his toys in an LEDC such as China, India or Pakistan.
Though India is developing it is still a LEDC (Less economically developed Country) and is considered a comparatively poor country.
I think it is a LEDC
Peru is an LEDC
LEDC
it is a LEDC.
LEDC