When Marcellinus describes the Huns as being "glued to their horses," he is emphasizing their exceptional skill and familiarity with horseback riding. This phrase suggests that the Huns were highly adept at riding horses and had a strong bond with their animals, indicating a deep connection and reliance on their equestrian abilities for mobility and warfare. The image evoked is one of seamless coordination and unity between the Huns and their horses, highlighting their prowess as mounted warriors.
It seems like there might be a misunderstanding in your question, as "accidentally" is a single word and does not have a different form to compare it with. If you meant to compare "accidentally" with another term, please clarify, and I'll be happy to help!
The weather is like 89-90 to degrees this affects plants in many ways because it means that they might die because to much sun isn't good for them and it affects animals because the animals might find no food and and water which is most important to animals also they wouldn't find shade.
Many desert animals are not abroad during the heat of the day and only emerge at night when it is cooler.
who cares douchebags.
A Roman historian like Ammianus Marcellinus might compare the Huns to unthinking animals to emphasize their perceived barbarism and savagery, contrasting them with the more "civilized" Roman culture. This comparison could serve to dehumanize the Huns, making their violent actions seem more instinctual and less rational, thereby justifying Roman fears and hostilities towards them. Additionally, such imagery would resonate with Roman audiences, reinforcing their cultural superiority and the need for military vigilance against perceived threats.
That is the way they were seen. If a person wasn't a Roman he/she was seen as a barbarian ( Greek for other) and treated very rudely and harshly. The Huns were barbarian and were very good horsemen, excellent fighters, and fierce in battle. They didn't fight using the Roman battle methods and to the Romans this barbaric.
That is the way they were seen. If a person wasn't a Roman he/she was seen as a barbarian ( Greek for other) and treated very rudely and harshly. The Huns were barbarian and were very good horsemen, excellent fighters, and fierce in battle. They didn't fight using the Roman battle methods and to the Romans this barbaric.
When Marcellinus describes the Huns as being "glued to their horses," he is emphasizing their exceptional skill and familiarity with horseback riding. This phrase suggests that the Huns were highly adept at riding horses and had a strong bond with their animals, indicating a deep connection and reliance on their equestrian abilities for mobility and warfare. The image evoked is one of seamless coordination and unity between the Huns and their horses, highlighting their prowess as mounted warriors.
One might compare auto warranties in many different places. For example, one might compare auto warranties in a newspaper ad, in a magazine ad, or even on the internet.
i believe that there might be alien animals out there
it depends. if its a person who hates animals and earth then they might be mean to them but if they love earth and animals then thwy might not.
when you want to compare numbers to which is greater, lower or even equal
all the above
A compare and contrast essay's purpose is to analyze the difference and similarities of two subjects.
Some people might not like animals because something might have happened to them in the past like, an animal might have bitten them or someone they know. They might just find animals frightening or anything else that might cause you to dislike something.
A religious believer might treat animals in a way that they believe their god would. This might include respect or sacrifices.