The problem is two fold here. The waste from nuclear sites is plentiful only because of foolish guidelines. For example water leaving a power plant can not have as much background radiation as it does when entering in some cases.
High level waste we all agree is an issue. Low level waste is not an ssue, but there is this grey area of medium level waste.
The simplest method would be to put this waste into barrels and bury it in New Mexico or other solid areas.
One interesting method that I was presented with by a passenger on a recent flight was this. We do not actually make radioactive material, we concentrate it. If we take three toms of dirt out of a half ounce of radioactive material, why not mix the material back into the stuff and fill the mine back up with it? No new amounts of radioactive material would be added to the area and the concentrations would be the same! How does one argue this?
no, its not safe to dispose nuclear waste in water,rather it would be safe to dispose it in common salt trenches.
Nuclear wastes are sometimes said to be a problem too difficult to solve because the waste stays radioactive for so long. The only thing that gets rid of nuclear waste is time.
We don't normally allow this to happen, the nuclear waste is tightly controlled. But after a disaster as at Chernobyl, the surrounding area is contaminated with radioactive fall out, so crops grown there or animals grazed there would also be affected.
All countries that have nuclear reactors have nuclear waste and it is always a problem, though a manageable one.
It is the Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository.
no, its not safe to dispose nuclear waste in water,rather it would be safe to dispose it in common salt trenches.
its expensive to dispose of the waste and the initial machinery is expensive to build.
No it does not however the fission material has to be mined from the ground and enriched then when it has been used alot of useless high level and/or low level radioactive waste is produced which is extremly difficult to dispose of.
Merits: it is efficient does not produce green house gases Demerits: it produces nuclear waste that can get people badly sick and eventualy kill them if exsposed to it and the waste is realy hard to "dispose" of
They are not good because of the pollution rate and the fact that the waste production is very hard to dispose of
Depending on where it is stored it could cause major pollution problems or even deaths.
high-level
Nuclear Energy is already clean. The problem is the 'radio-active' waste from the reactor. A lot of research is going on to dispose of radio-active waste safely. One possibility is 'vitrifiction' and then burying it in deep mines.
ocean
Nuclear wastes are sometimes said to be a problem too difficult to solve because the waste stays radioactive for so long. The only thing that gets rid of nuclear waste is time.
There was no testing done at Yucca mountain; it is just a place where they plan on storing nuclear waste in order to dispose of it.
It's highly radioactive.