"Well you should believe in god, you're standing on him right now," maybe? Who knows, I think the question assumes the pantheist would want to convince the atheist of something. Assuming there was a debate between the two, you might be able to generally guess that perhaps the pantheist would attempt to reason the ways that creation and/or "god" or spiritualism is apparent in everything one could examine.
Yes
yes , she belives in science Iver here say.
No. I can't find evidence that he is. His gaff with the disguise illustrates that he likely is not or he would have claimed it in his apology. An interview he gave describes himself as spiritual but not religious and sources say he is predominantly an Irish-American.
Most likely he's Christian . But some rumors say that he's an atheist.
Many people say he is Muslim, but he actually does not embrace any religion, although his uncle was Muslim and named him Khalifa.
Atheist comes from "theist," a believer in god or gods, and "a-" meaning not. Monotheist, polytheist, and pantheist have the same root. So atheist means one who does not believe in God.
Atheist believe there is no god/gods, pantheism believes everything is god. Technically one can be both an atheist and a pantheist if one believes that everything is sacred/holy but not god (as some radical environmentalists do).
He would be best described as a pantheist.
Yes
Sacrilege is the violation or injurious treatment of a sacred object.From a theist point of view it is possible for an atheist to be sacrilegious however, atheist's do not believe in "sacred" objects and would therefore say no.
Atheist answerWell, just say that you are an atheist and that you don't believe in god.
No, unless you raise them to be athiest.
As there are no atheists priests, and weddings are a religious ceremony, atheists marry through common law marriage through a justice of the peace. This is actually false: There now stands a church called the "First Church of Atheism". The Church is dedicated to ordaining "Atheist Ministers" of sorts so that atheist can be married by an atheist. Basically, they can either not have a ceremony and just get the papers filled out, or they can have a ceremony, and the reverend can pretty much say whatever he (or more likely) the couple would like him to say.
No. Spinoza was a Deist. Spinoza was a pantheist == == == == Spinoza was definitely an atheist given any modern definition of the word. He argues that everything is a part of "God or Nature" and basically says that every "thing" is a part of Nature, which could also be called God, but God is not a transcendent being with free will, as one would typically define the god of theism. He doesn't think God can do miracles, act outside of his own nature, or be separated from what we would call the material and intellectual world. He is not a deist, deism consists of a transcendent God who is not one with the universe in any conceivable way. Spinoza is a Natural Pantheist, which is an important distinction from the pantheism involved in Hinduism or even Christianity. Pantheism is not distinct from atheism or theism in many ways, and it was probably an artifact of Spinoza's cultural environment that kept him from realizing the lack of distinction between his metaphysics and atheism. == == == ==
This can be looked at from three perspectives. One is from a christian. they would say it was positive. Another is from an atheist (one who does not believe in god). They would say it was negative. But the third, from someone who doesn't really care would say that it had no effect.
An atheist does not believe in God.
He's a Pantheist