GIBSON > EPIPHONE
Yes because epiphone are made by Gibson. epiphone are cheaper simply because they don't say Gibson.
Epiphone first introduced the Gibson Les Paul Junior in 1954. The Gibson Les Paul Junior is a solid body electrical guitar, and was first released with a single cut body style.
the studio, it has better electronics and hardware
Epiphone is very much similar to Gibson, at a cheaper price. Epiphone is owned by Gibson. Gibson makes Epiphone to give guitarists a Gibson feel, at a lower price, without sacrificing quality. Epiphone has some models of its own that Gibson doesn't, and Epiphone makes guitars with the same basic body shape and with some similar technology, hardware and electrical components. I own two Epiphones and a Les Paul, but I dont see any difference in quality between the two brands. I guess it just depends on sound taste. Gibson has a warmer feel to it, while Epiphone has a sharper sound. So basically think of Epiphone as a little brother of Gibson.
Well, for one there super cheap. Secondly, they tend to play about as good as a Gibson, compairing the Standard Gibson with the Epiphone, and thirdly, they sound good with pretty much any amp, they can be used for almost any type of music, and are quite a bit lighter, weight wise, than a gibson. From a personal standpoint, I have a couple guitars, and one of them is the Epiphone Les Paul Special II, Another is the Dean Vendetta Camo, I play them on a Line6 spider III, and the Epiphone has more tone for metal, the epiphone has more tone for solos, the epiphone sounds better on the clean channel, (but only when play rythm) and it looks alot better than the Dean, now I know there are some differences between the two, but I do preffer the Epiphone over the Dean, however to be fair, I will say this, the Dean has a MUCH faster neck than the Epiphone, and the Dean's all (even the cheapest, most crapy playing) have 24 fretts to Epiphone's (all that I know of) 22 frets. I am going to turn the Dean guitar in for Epiphone Standard Les Paul, but first I will change the pickups in the epiphone for Gibsons, just for Giggles. And I'll update when I do.
No
Yes because epiphone are made by Gibson. epiphone are cheaper simply because they don't say Gibson.
It is better, this is a premium instrument and both are great.
Gibson Les Paul Epiphone Les Paul (Copy of Gibson)
paul reed smith just look at the price range but if your on a budjet go with epiphone
the studio, it has better electronics and hardware
Epiphone first introduced the Gibson Les Paul Junior in 1954. The Gibson Les Paul Junior is a solid body electrical guitar, and was first released with a single cut body style.
Gibson are far better than epiphone because Gibson bought epiphone to basically use them as a cheaper, not as good quality versions of g the Gibson models. Gibson do not only sound better but are much easier to play. although gibsons are very expenssive (sg=£600-1000 les paul=£1000-5000) i would suggest that if you can afford one, then you should buy one as it will improve your playing as well.
Umm, its fine but if you want a bolt on neck then get a Gibson les paul it's better quality but similar style
Gibson Heritage Cherry ES-137 - Epiphone Sheraton II - Gibson Les Paul Custom
An electric Gibson or Epiphone Les Paul has six strings, but a bass has usually has 4.
Epiphone is very much similar to Gibson, at a cheaper price. Epiphone is owned by Gibson. Gibson makes Epiphone to give guitarists a Gibson feel, at a lower price, without sacrificing quality. Epiphone has some models of its own that Gibson doesn't, and Epiphone makes guitars with the same basic body shape and with some similar technology, hardware and electrical components. I own two Epiphones and a Les Paul, but I dont see any difference in quality between the two brands. I guess it just depends on sound taste. Gibson has a warmer feel to it, while Epiphone has a sharper sound. So basically think of Epiphone as a little brother of Gibson.