answersLogoWhite

0

I suppose you mean in the US? Somebody has to store it, it won't go away, and it will have to be stored for centuries to come. Up to now it has all been stored on the power station sites, and at many of these the provided water storage ponds have been filled and dry stores have had to be provided for the older waste which is less active but still dangerous to life. The country needs a solution. One could envision each electricity company owning the plants to be responsible, but I think this would lead to unsatisfactory short cuts which might give trouble in years to come when these companies have disappeared. We have to think long term. The States could be responsible for each State's waste, but then there may not be suitable places for a store in all States that have nuclear plants. The best solution for the country would therefore be to have a national repository in the best place geologically for it, but then no State especially one which does not even have nuclear plants will want to take this task on. The proposed site at Yucca Mountain Nevada is now in doubt I believe. As an outsider, I would have thought the solution was for the Federal Govt to own some territory where they can do what is required, but this wasn't thought of when the country was being carved up into States, apart from Washington DC, and that is hardly suitable on grounds of population density apart from geology.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Where are you currently storing nuclear waste in the US?

On the power station sites mostly


Which is a characteristic of surface high-level nuclear waste storage that is not a characteristic of storing the waste in a geological repository?

easily recovered


What testing was done at yucca mountain?

There was no testing done at Yucca mountain; it is just a place where they plan on storing nuclear waste in order to dispose of it.


What is the problem with storing nuclear waste material?

The challenge of making nuclear power safer doesn't end after the power has been generated. Nuclear fuel remains dangerously radioactive for thousands of years after it is no longer useful in a commercial reactor. The resulting waste disposal problem has become a major challenge for policymakers.


Is e waste worse than nuclear waste?

nuclear waste is worst


What waste is produced from nuclear power stations?

nuclear waste


Is there nuclear waste in space?

Yes, there is nuclear waste in space.


How does turkey point dispose of their nuclear waste?

Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station manages its nuclear waste primarily by storing spent nuclear fuel on-site in a dry cask storage facility. Initially, spent fuel is stored in spent fuel pools, where it is cooled and shielded by water. Over time, as the radioactive material decays, the fuel is transferred to robust, sealed casks designed to safely contain the waste for long periods. The facility follows strict regulatory guidelines to ensure the safe handling and storage of nuclear waste.


What does Yucca Mountain have to do with nuclear radiation?

Yucca Mountain is a proposed repository site for storing high-level nuclear waste in the United States. The site was chosen for its geologic stability and isolation to prevent radiation from reaching the environment. If approved and constructed, Yucca Mountain would be used to store spent nuclear fuel and other radioactive waste generated by nuclear power plants.


What are the causes of nuclear and toxic waste?

nuclear waste is a by product of nuclear power plants, or in the creation of nuclear weapons.


What does nuclear waste contain?

nuclear waste contains about 90 % of nuclear fuel but it is much harmful then nuclear itself.


Why is yucca mountain is good and bad?

Yucca Mountain is seen as a potential repository for storing nuclear waste due to its geological stability and remote location, which could minimize risk to the environment. However, concerns exist regarding the long-term safety and viability of storing radioactive waste in a single location, potential water contamination, and the transportation risks of moving waste to the site.