The higher the wattage, the more electrical energy is being used. In a light bulb the electrical energy is converted to EM energy which appears in both visible and infrared parts of the spectrum, so the answer is no, it will be at a higher rate for a 100 watt bulb
Brainwaves are electrical signals transmitted through neurons in the brain and travel at speeds much slower than the speed of light. The speed of brainwave transmission is typically measured in meters per second, while the speed of light is about 299,792 kilometers per second in a vacuum.
faster atoms have more kinetic energy than slower atoms do.
Potential energy is unreleased energy - an unmoving rock at the top of a cliff, or a stick of dynamite. Potential energy becomes kinetic energy when it is released - the rock is falling from the cliff, or the stick of dynamite is exploding. So technically the answer is yes. Kinetic even means "motion"! But be careful about saying that potential energy is "slower" than kinetic, or in trying to distinguish between the two based on how fast you perceive an object to move. Kinetic energy doesn't necessarily make an object "look" as if it is moving faster. For example, heating water in a microwave converts potential energy (a difference in voltage between the two prongs of the microwave plug) into kinetic energy (an increase in the temperature of the water), but the water doesn't "look" as if it is going "faster" until it actually boils - the actual change in velocity is at the molecular level of the water.
-- If the energy of the particle is its kinetic energy, then removing kinetic energy certainly slows it down. -- If the energy of the particle is its heat energy, then that too is nothing more than the kinetic energy of its molecules. Remove heat energy from it, and the average kinetic energy of its molecules ... along with their average speed ... decreases. -- If an object started out high above the ground and then fell to the ground, it gains speed constantly while it's falling. This is not a counterexample of losing energy, since the falling object doesn't lose any energy ... it just trades potential for kinetic. So it doesn't belong in this discussion at all.
Kinetic
that is such a lie the electronics just use extra energy
Brainwaves are electrical signals transmitted through neurons in the brain and travel at speeds much slower than the speed of light. The speed of brainwave transmission is typically measured in meters per second, while the speed of light is about 299,792 kilometers per second in a vacuum.
Light energy consists of electromagnetic waves that travel at the speed of light, while sound energy consists of mechanical waves that travel at a much slower speed. Light energy does not require a medium to travel through, whereas sound energy does. Light energy can travel through a vacuum, whereas sound energy cannot.
Yes, the speed of sound waves is slower than the speed of electromagnetic waves. Sound waves travel through a medium, such as air or water, at a speed that depends on the properties of that medium. Electromagnetic waves, such as light, can travel through a vacuum at a speed of about 300,000 kilometers per second.
When particles of a gas lose thermal energy, they move slower. This is because temperature and kinetic energy are directly proportional - as thermal energy decreases, the average kinetic energy of the particles decreases, leading to slower movement.
faster atoms have more kinetic energy than slower atoms do.
Electromagnetism is manifest along a continuum between slower radio waves and faster energy gamma waves. Visible light can be found in the range between infrared light (slower than waves of visible light) and ultraviolet light (faster than waves of visible light).
Grass can continue to grow at night through a process called respiration, where it converts stored energy into growth. However, growth may be slower compared to during the day when photosynthesis occurs.
I might be wrong, but I would say slower. If you mean energy in form of heat, molecules move slower if the liquid is colder, so if a liquid releases energy in form of heat (turns ¨cooler¨), than the molecules move slower. As I said, I might be wrong. Just my thoughts
It depends upon the mass of the particles also. Assuming equal mass, then the slower moving particle gains some energy, and the faster moving particle loses energy. However, if the slower moving particle had greater mass, it could transfer energy to the faster moving particle.
Because then the oxygen converts into carbon dioxide slower than it should in order for you to survive
cause the air has less heat(energy) and will vibrate slower.