Viruses are incapable of self-replication, therefore by definition all viruses are "pathogenic" i.e. they must invade a host cell in order to multiply and propagate themselves. However, not all viruses are pathogenic to humans - some will only infect plants or animals.
Emerging viruses
A pathogen = a virus. An organism, macro or micro, is alive, but viruses cannot technically be considered 'living.' Thus, non-pathogenic means 'not a virus'.
No, Bacteria are everywhere and life could not exist as we know it without them. Thus in general bacteria are not a biological hazard.However, some types of bacteria are pathogenic (they can cause diseases). These species of bacteria are a biological hazard.
Viruses are biological entities because they contain genetic material (DNA or RNA) and require a host cell to replicate. However, they lack the cellular machinery needed for metabolic processes and must infect host cells to reproduce.
To " not be generative of disease. "
Emerging viruses
Pathogenic viruses cause illnesses and disease.
If you do not seal a tin can correctly it can contain Pathogens, or deadly bacteria thatcan shut down the nervous system.
Biological.
Yes, animals get viruses just like humans does it is a pathogenic disease that is transmitted by a molecule
Infection
Biological viruses.
Infectious disease
By analogy with biological viruses.
One of them is pathogenic ... that is, it produces disease... and the other one doesn't. The answer is more or less contained in the question. The reason one produces a disease and the other doesn't has to do with the precise details of each, and cannot be answered generally. Some viruses are pathogenic in a particular species and harmless in others; other viruses affect entire classes of organisms (for example, pretty much all mammals can get rabies).
Disinfection
I think there alike because they all still have that infection in them so it really doesn't make a difference.