Theoretically ablack holecan merge with another black hole if they come close enough to each other.
Note: There is no real empirical evidence that Black Holes have grown or shrunken. While there are observations of the release of energy consistent the annihilation of matter, these observations are the representative behavior of conditions upon the Event Horizon of the Black Hole and not the inner works of the Black Hole itself. If fact our best evidence ever was provided with the observations of the three-telescope interferometry. The astrophysicists described their findings as a ring of hot dust that marks the transition from a more-distant mixture of gas and dust in a toroidal (doughnut-shaped) structure, to a gaseous disk closer to the black hole. The dusty part, he said, is interesting because it dominates the infrared emission of active galactic nuclei and can be easily observed. However there are no measurements relevant to growth such as increased density relative to its static size or increased size relative to its static density. And the latest consensus is that there is not a relevant relationship between the observable size of the accumulated bulge about the Black Hole and the size of the Black Hole itself.
Rather what has been observed is that there are many Black Holes of varying sizes and behaviors. And from these collective observations scientists have conjectured upon the possible evolution of Black Holes upon the principles following the same pattern of gravitational accretion as normal matter. Problem is that there is no real empirical evidence that normal matter exists at the center of a Black Hole. Even stellar growth is more relevant to the behavioral state of nuclear reactions within the star, relative to its energy versus mass density. Other observations are more problematic - i.e. small Black Holes with a large amount galactic matter and large Black Holes with a small amount of galactic matter. These anomalous observations give rise to theories on the Black Hole's condition even unto its creation.
You cannot see a black hole when you are on Earth, unless a black hole were to absorb Earth, which even then, you would see it in a split-second before it would engulf you
A black hole is a type of star with excessive gravity. Here are some sentences.The star was sucked into the black hole close by.A black hole will even absorb light.The scientist is studying a black hole.
They will merge to form a single black hole with the combined mass of the town that merged.
Yes!
No, a black hole is not racist. It is a region in space where gravity is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape from it. The term "black hole" refers to its ability to absorb all forms of energy and matter within its event horizon.
That's not exactly what happens. What really happens is that they just absorb each other and become a bigger black hole.
You cannot see a black hole when you are on Earth, unless a black hole were to absorb Earth, which even then, you would see it in a split-second before it would engulf you
A black hole does not create a star. A black hole is formed when a star dies.
A black hole is a type of star with excessive gravity. Here are some sentences.The star was sucked into the black hole close by.A black hole will even absorb light.The scientist is studying a black hole.
They will merge to form a single black hole with the combined mass of the town that merged.
A black body absorbs most of the light that falls on it. A perfect black body will absorb all of the light but will radiate electromagnetic energy according to it's temperature according to plank's law. This is why we call a black hole a BLACK hole. It absorbs EVERYTHING which falls into it and not even light can escape.
Yes!
Yes, it is possible for a black hole to capture another one and "swallow" it.
They're still called black holes. A black hole remains defined as a black hole as long as it absorb everything near them, both energy and matter, including gas.
A virtual black hole would probably not exist long, so it won't have much time to absorb anything. Other than that, I don't see any reason why it should make a difference between particles and antiparticles.
If you get very close to a black hole you will get spaghettified or in another words black hole will rip you to shreds because gravity of black hole is so immense that even light can't escaped from it .
i believe the black hole crushes the object into another small black hole which just ads to the already infinate space within