I don't quite know what you mean by predicted (please try to make your questions very clear) but assuming you mean 'can their creation be predicted', then the answer is 'yes'. We know that very massive stars will leave a remnant that exceeds about 3-4 solar masses after they go supernova. If the stellar ruminant is above this mass then a black hole will form.
We can also predict where black holes 'are' by their effect on nearby bodies, this is how we know were and how massive the black hole in the centre of our galaxy is. Also although black holes do not emit light they do distort light passing near them and we can predict what this would look like (see related link below).
He did not discover them. He did some calculations that predicted the possibility of the existence of black holes.
Stephen Hawking predicted that black holes emit black body radiation, now known as Hawking radiation, in 1974. This groundbreaking idea challenged previous beliefs about black holes and their behavior.
White holes are theoretical regions of spacetime that expel matter and energy outward, the opposite of black holes which pull matter in. They do not suck up objects like black holes do. However, there is no observational evidence for the existence of white holes in the universe.
The concept of black holes was first predicted by physicist John Michell in 1783, who proposed the idea of "dark stars" with gravity so strong that not even light could escape. However, the modern understanding of black holes emerged from Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity in 1915, which allowed scientists like Karl Schwarzschild to derive solutions that described these objects. Further developments in the 1960s, particularly by researchers like Roger Penrose and Stephen Hawking, solidified the theoretical framework for black holes.
Most micro black holes are predicted to evaporate through Hawking radiation, a process where they lose mass over time. The smaller the black hole, the faster it will evaporate. However, there are still uncertainties surrounding the exact mechanisms of black hole evaporation.
yes. some black holes are predicted to be the size of an electron.
He did not discover them. He did some calculations that predicted the possibility of the existence of black holes.
Stephen Hawking predicted that black holes emit black body radiation, now known as Hawking radiation, in 1974. This groundbreaking idea challenged previous beliefs about black holes and their behavior.
White holes are theoretical regions of spacetime that expel matter and energy outward, the opposite of black holes which pull matter in. They do not suck up objects like black holes do. However, there is no observational evidence for the existence of white holes in the universe.
Black holes fascinate me by there huge size on great gravitational force. The fact that light can't even get out so we cant study the center much is also pretty amazing. The thing that disturbed many astrophysicists when black holes were first theorized was the fact that the theory predicted an object that would destroy the theory that predicted it.
Black holes does emit radiation, but they cannot be detected from earth. We use gravitational lensing to "see" the black holes.
Most micro black holes are predicted to evaporate through Hawking radiation, a process where they lose mass over time. The smaller the black hole, the faster it will evaporate. However, there are still uncertainties surrounding the exact mechanisms of black hole evaporation.
Primordial black holes are theoretical black holes that could have formed in the early universe. They are thought to be small and have a wide range of masses. If they exist, they could have implications for dark matter, gravitational waves, and the evolution of the universe.
The general theory of relativity, proposed by Einstein in 1916, embodied the notion of gravitation, a phenomenon derived from a local curvature of spacetime. One profound implication, an outgrowth of the field equations of the theory, was the existence of black holes.
yes but not likely
It depends on what you're studying besides black holes. If you're studying planets along with black holes, you could be an astrophysicist. Or, if you're studying atoms along with black holes, you could be a theoretical physicist. Just a few examples.
A black hole? well scientist are not sure. Black holes is a theory, not proving to be true. But there could be.