PURPLE
Yes, red light is generally more visible than blue light because our eyes are more sensitive to longer wavelengths like red. This is why red light is often used in situations where visibility is key, such as traffic lights and emergency beacons.
Depends on what kind of plant. Plants with red and yellow leaves, such as maple, absorb more blue light. I use a blue LED light for my herbs growing. And my herbs are growing well. http://www.yescomusa.com/product.php?productid=597&cat=130&page=1
Red and blue light will not absorb the same light. Red objects reflect red light and absorb other colors, while blue objects reflect blue light and absorb other colors.
A bright red light would have more photons compared to a dim blue light. The brightness of a light source is related to the number of photons emitted per unit time, so a brighter light source will have more photons.
A tungsten-halogen light bulb is most likely to cause a plant to wilt because it generates heat that can damage the plant cells and dry out the soil. Fluorescent light bulbs, whether red or blue, are generally better options for plant growth as they produce less heat and provide a spectrum of light that is beneficial for photosynthesis.
The three sources of white light are the sun, incandescent light bulbs, and fluorescent light bulbs.
The differences between red and blue light are Red stands for n00b and blue stands for b00b! your mum
No, office fluorescent lights are not ideal for plants because they do not provide the full spectrum of light that plants need for photosynthesis. Plants require a specific balance of red and blue light, which is not typically provided by standard fluorescent lights.
Blue light has a higher frequency than red light. This means that blue light has shorter wavelengths and carries more energy compared to red light. Additionally, blue light is more likely to scatter in the atmosphere, leading to effects like blue skies during the day.
Blue light scatters more than red light. This is because blue light has a shorter wavelength, causing it to interact more with particles in the atmosphere, like air molecules and dust, which leads to more scattering.
no red uses more energy
Red does as it absorbs photons at blue end of the spectrum( the higher energy) and reflects light at the red end of the spectrum (a lower energy). While the blue light absorbs energy at the red end of the spectrum and reflects blue light
Blue light is diffracted more than red. The way I remember is by thinking about the waves being closer together in the blue light and knowing that each wave interacts with the whatever is causing the diffraction (grating or object). More waves in a given area means more interaction which means more diffraction.
Fluorescent lights emit a spectrum of visible light that typically includes various wavelengths in the blue and green regions, with smaller amounts in the red and violet regions. They also emit ultraviolet light, which is not visible to the human eye but can cause fluorescence in certain materials.
Red light has a longer wavelength and is considered to be less energetic than blue light, which has a shorter wavelength and higher energy. Blue light is more likely to cause digital eye strain and disrupt sleep patterns compared to red light. Exposure to blue light from screens and devices can lead to more vision-related issues compared to red light.
A little bit of blue and the more of the color red. It does vary though
Blue light has a shorter wavelength than red light, which causes it to interact more with particles and molecules in the atmosphere, resulting in more scattering. This is known as Rayleigh scattering, where shorter wavelengths are scattered more effectively than longer wavelengths.