What viruses do is they are not living, so they use the cell's life to 'reproduce'. They take all of the cell's nutrition and use that to multiply. Then the cell is dead, and the viruses go on to take over more cells.
Most scientists consider viruses as the link between living an non living organisms. Viruses are considered non-living by some scientists because - 1) They donot perform any metabolic activities. 2) Outside the host cell , viruses are present only in crystalised form. (Even after it is un-crystalised , it does not lose it's capacity for infection) 3) It does not require any sort of "food".
No. Virologists, the scientists who study viruses, don't consider them living things because they do not meet all the criteria of the definition of life.
Well, honey, scientists don't believe viruses are living organisms because they lack the ability to carry out essential life processes on their own. They can't reproduce without hijacking a host cell, so they're more like freeloaders than independent living beings. It's like calling a computer virus a living thing just because it can mess up your day.
Many, if not most biologists do not consider viruses living. So, they are not on any phylogenetic tree that I know of. They may have a phylogeny that I am unaware of, though.
Many scientists consider viruses to be non living because each and every living organism must carry out these 7 life processes for it to be considered living: Movement, Reproduction, Sensitivity, Growth, Respiration, Excretion and Nutrition. Viruses do all of these things except reproduction, which they cannot do. Instead, they multiply by using other living organism's cells which has caused a lot of debate over whether that counts as reproduction in the scientific community.
They don't have a Nucleus.
virologist is a scientist that sudies viruses.
virologist is a scientist that sudies viruses.
Viruses either have a strand of DNA or RNA not both like living organisms. They need a host (you and me) in order to replicate.
Most scientists consider viruses as the link between living an non living organisms. Viruses are considered non-living by some scientists because - 1) They donot perform any metabolic activities. 2) Outside the host cell , viruses are present only in crystalised form. (Even after it is un-crystalised , it does not lose it's capacity for infection) 3) It does not require any sort of "food".
A virologist is a scientist who studies viruses.
None. Viruses are acellular. Many biologists do not consider viruses to be living things in part because they are acellular. Look at any phylogeny (tree of life). Viruses are not on them.
Bacteria and viruses are small and can only be seen through a microscope. The small living things are microorganisms or microbes. Some people do not think viruses are living things because they are acellular particles. They consider them to be an organic structure that interacts with living organisms.
Biologists consider dormant virions to be non-living because they must obtain a host to function and replicate themselves. However, active viruses are considered to be living, by most scientists.
A scientist that studies viruses is called a virologist.
Virology is the study of viruses and their evolution, structure, classification. It also is complexes of nuclies acids and proteins that help all living cells.
No. Virologists, the scientists who study viruses, don't consider them living things because they do not meet all the criteria of the definition of life.