probably.. but we shouldn't cut trees down anyway because they give us oxygen!
Forests take in carbon dioxide ( CO2 ) and liberate oxygen ( O2 ). Carbon dioxide is the cause of greenhouse effect which causes global warming. Hence, if they are more forests then more carbon dioxide is absorbed and there is less of greenhouse effect thus overall global cooling.
The opposite of global warming is global cooling, which refers to a decrease in the Earth's average temperature over an extended period of time.
Junk mail means that more trees are cut down for the paper. Trees remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, so trees slow global warming. If there are fewer trees, then global warming increases.
If global cooling means the gradual cooling into an Ice Age, then that has happened in the past and it has taken thousands of years to happen. The present global warming has all happened far faster, in less than 200 years, and is threatening all life on the planet if we can't stop it. Global warming is by far the more dangerous situation.
destroyed natureThe man has destroyed the nature by the cutting the trees and very important thing what he done is discovering nuclear weapon which has leads to global warming RamaKrishnaANSWER:He has not. Man can influence some changes for a time, but we don't have the capabillity. We have polluted the air but one volcano eruption can cause more. We have cut down trees but more trees are grown elsewhere. The greatest thing about scientific predictions of global warming is that in the 1970's it was concerned with global cooling. That's why they don't have a clue.
Forests take in carbon dioxide ( CO2 ) and liberate oxygen ( O2 ). Carbon dioxide is the cause of greenhouse effect which causes global warming. Hence, if they are more forests then more carbon dioxide is absorbed and there is less of greenhouse effect thus overall global cooling.
The reverse change of global warming is global cooling, which refers to a decrease in average temperatures worldwide. Global freezing is not a recognized scientific term but can be used colloquially to emphasize extreme cold conditions.
The opposite of global warming is global cooling, which refers to a decrease in the Earth's average temperature over an extended period of time.
It cools it somewhat. Global cooling occurs after a volcanic eruption when clouds of dust remain in the sky for several days reflecting the sun's rays. This results in a cooling of the atmosphere.
No, definitely not.
Junk mail means that more trees are cut down for the paper. Trees remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, so trees slow global warming. If there are fewer trees, then global warming increases.
If global cooling means the gradual cooling into an Ice Age, then that has happened in the past and it has taken thousands of years to happen. The present global warming has all happened far faster, in less than 200 years, and is threatening all life on the planet if we can't stop it. Global warming is by far the more dangerous situation.
There was a time in the 1970s when scientists though the earth might be approaching a global cooling period. This was quickly proved incorrect. But a possible result of global cooling would be more ice caps, larger glaciers, colder winters, cooler summers etc.
Trees help to reduce global warming by cleaning the air. Here's how: A greenhouse gas that causes global warming is carbon dioxide. Trees breathe just like we do except when they breathe they take in carbon dioxide, they store the carbon in their trunks and branches for years, and they release the oxygen. Trees will also help you save a bit of money on heating/cooling bills if you plant them in the right place. See Related Link.
Forest vegetation has a cooling effect on the climate. This is because all growing plants and trees remove carbon dioxide, the greenhouse gas causing global warming, from the atmosphere.
destroyed natureThe man has destroyed the nature by the cutting the trees and very important thing what he done is discovering nuclear weapon which has leads to global warming RamaKrishnaANSWER:He has not. Man can influence some changes for a time, but we don't have the capabillity. We have polluted the air but one volcano eruption can cause more. We have cut down trees but more trees are grown elsewhere. The greatest thing about scientific predictions of global warming is that in the 1970's it was concerned with global cooling. That's why they don't have a clue.
destroyed natureThe man has destroyed the nature by the cutting the trees and very important thing what he done is discovering nuclear weapon which has leads to global warming RamaKrishnaANSWER:He has not. Man can influence some changes for a time, but we don't have the capabillity. We have polluted the air but one volcano eruption can cause more. We have cut down trees but more trees are grown elsewhere. The greatest thing about scientific predictions of global warming is that in the 1970's it was concerned with global cooling. That's why they don't have a clue.