No, evolution does not violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
No life disobeys the Second Law. Zygotes become embryos, embryos become foetuses, foetuses become babies, then children, then adults. All zygote-to-adult growth fails to disobey the Second Law. There is a constant influx of energy into the growing individuals through nutrition. All life carries out nutrition. There is always energy available for growth and reproduction and if there is enough energy for that, then there is enough energy for change/evolution. In this sense, Law-disobeying complexity is not added, from prokaryote to eukaryote or even from bacterium to human. It is simply growth from neonate-form to adult and there is certainly enough energy for that.
"Unavailable for doing work" is related to the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
Second Law of Thermodynamics
No biological entity violates any of the laws of thermodynamics.
The second law of thermodynamics would be violated in situations where heat spontaneously flows from a colder object to a hotter one without any external work being done, as this contradicts the natural direction of heat transfer. Additionally, a perpetual motion machine of the second kind, which could convert thermal energy completely into mechanical work without any energy loss, would also violate this law. In essence, any scenario that suggests entropy could decrease in a closed system or that energy could be perfectly converted without loss would breach the second law.
The Second Law of Thermodynamics.
The second law does NOT make evolution impossible. It just requires that as evolution takes place that there be an increase in entropy of the universe as a whole.
If you are suggesting a "perpetual motion" scenerio, it would violate the first or second laws of thermodynamics. Many inventors dream of perpetual motion machines, but they are an impossible dream according to the laws of thermodynamics. The second law of thermodynamics says that an engine or process of any type must always have an efficiency of less than 100%. A perpetual motion machine that uses a generator to power the motor that runs the generator requires both the generator and motor to operate with 100% efficiency. This type of perpetual motion machine does not violate the first law of thermodynamics, but violates the second law of thermodynamics. It is a perpetual motion machine of the second kind because it violates the second law of thermodynamics. Not even the cleverest engineer or inventor can build a perpetual motion machine because it would violate either the first or second law of thermodynamics, which are fundamental laws of physics.
Quite simply, that would violate the First Law of Thermodynamics, or the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The pressure difference is caused by the weight of the water above it, and it is an equilibrium situation.
Yes. It has to be so, since it would otherwise be possible to violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics!
"Unavailable for doing work" is related to the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
second law
Second Law of Thermodynamics
No biological entity violates any of the laws of thermodynamics.
The theory of evolution does not vs the law of thermodynamics. They are quite compatible since the earth is an open system.
It is the idea of a machine continuously producing energy, without energy input - or producing more energy than what is put into the machine. This would violate the First Law of Thermodynamics (conservation of energy), and in general, it is not believed to be possible. No process is known which violates the conservation of energy. (A "perpetual motion machine of the second kind" would violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics; this is generally believed to be impossible, too.)
The fact that usable energy is always lost in an energy transfer is due to the second law of thermodynamics. This law states that entropy, or disorder, tends to increase over time in a closed system, leading to the loss of usable energy in the form of heat.
True