0
The scientific method relies more on reasoning than intuition. It involves systematic observation, experimentation, and logical analysis to draw conclusions based on empirical evidence. While intuition can play a role in formulating hypotheses or generating ideas, the core process of the scientific method emphasizes critical thinking and rational evaluation to ensure reliability and validity in findings.
What else can I help you with?
How did the new scientific method that was developed in the 1500s and 1600s differ from the traditional approach to science?
The new scientific method focused on systematic observation, experimentation, hypothesis testing, and drawing conclusions based on evidence. This contrasted with the traditional approach that relied more on speculation, reliance on authority, and reasoning based on philosophical principles. The new method emphasized empirical evidence and reproducibility in order to arrive at more reliable and objective results.
Differentiate Scientific and unscientific method of acquiring knowledge?
Scientific method-Acquiring knowledge in scientific method will have strong basics and more rational. The knowledge can be acquired from books and experiments Unscientific method-This kind of knowledge will be only a hypothesis and belief. This can be achieved through experience and from elders
What is the difference between the natural logic and the scientific logic?
Natural logic refers to the everyday reasoning that humans use based on intuition and common sense, while scientific logic refers to the systematic and evidence-based approach used in scientific inquiry to analyze and understand the natural world. Scientific logic involves the use of empirical data, observation, experimentation, and logical reasoning to draw conclusions and make predictions, whereas natural logic relies more on personal experiences and beliefs.
Why is psychology from a scientific approach more reliable than through intuition and common sense?
Psychology is not a science. The psychologist Carl Jung use to get hammered by his critics because he wrote his theories on psychology in a scientific style. But psychology cannot be tested in a scientific way.
Scientific hypotheses are more often tested by the process of?
Scientific hypotheses are more often tested by the process of experimentation, where researchers manipulate one or more variables to observe the effects on the outcome. This method allows scientists to gather evidence to support or refute their hypotheses, leading to the development of theories and scientific knowledge.
How is the scientific method similar to or different from superstition guessing intuitio and hope?
The scientific method differs from superstition, guessing, intuition, and hope in that it relies on systematic observation, experimentation, and evidence to draw conclusions. While superstition and intuition may offer explanations based on personal beliefs or feelings, they lack empirical support and repeatability. In contrast, the scientific method emphasizes testing hypotheses and revising theories based on observable data, fostering a more reliable understanding of the natural world. Ultimately, the scientific method seeks objective truth, while superstition and intuition often reflect subjective interpretations or desires.
How did the scientific method differ from the method of Aristotle?
The scientific method emphasizes rigorous experimentation, observation, and data analysis to test hypotheses and draw conclusions, while Aristotle relied more on reasoning and logic to understand the natural world. The scientific method also involves systematic collection of evidence and replication of results to ensure reliability, whereas Aristotle's method often relied on deductive principles and philosophical reasoning.
What is the difference between making decisions based on logical reasoning versus emotional intuition?
Making decisions based on logical reasoning involves using facts, evidence, and critical thinking to reach a conclusion. On the other hand, decisions based on emotional intuition rely on feelings, instincts, and gut reactions. The main difference is that logical reasoning is more analytical and objective, while emotional intuition is more subjective and based on personal emotions.
How did Descartes help to shape the scientific method?
He had the idea that it is through rational thought (not experience) that we gain knowledge. So he thought people should question scientic hypotheseis using deductive reasoning to help achieve more clarity in the scientific method. (His ideas are in the book "Discourse on Method")
Francis Bacon created a new way of scientific thinking called inductive reasoning. How was this different from the deductive reasoning of earlier eras?
Francis Bacon's inductive reasoning emphasizes drawing general conclusions from specific observations and experiments, moving from particular instances to broader generalizations. In contrast, deductive reasoning, which was prominent in earlier eras, starts with general principles or theories and derives specific conclusions from them. This shift in approach allowed for a more empirical method of scientific inquiry, prioritizing observation and experimentation over established dogma. Ultimately, Bacon's inductive reasoning laid the groundwork for the modern scientific method.
Are the answers from the scientific approach more reliable than those based on intuition and common sense?
yes
Why is a subjective reasoning not an example of a scientific thought?
A subjective reasoning is based on how you feel about something more than an actual fact. A scientific thought is emotionless and based on pure facts.
How is scientific reason different from other ways of thinking?
Scientific reasoning is more disciplined and more logical than other ways of thinking.
What was the goal of the scientific method devolped by bacon and descrates?
The scientific method developed by Francis Bacon and René Descartes aimed to establish a systematic approach to inquiry that emphasized empirical observation and rational analysis. Bacon advocated for inductive reasoning, encouraging the collection of data through experimentation to form general principles, while Descartes emphasized deductive reasoning and skepticism. Together, their contributions sought to eliminate biases and uncertainties in scientific investigation, fostering a more reliable understanding of the natural world. This method laid the foundation for modern scientific practices, promoting rigorous testing and validation of hypotheses.
What is the scientific process?
It answers scientific questions using a formal method. apex;D
History of scientific method?
The scientific method has its roots in ancient philosophy, notably in the works of Greek philosophers like Aristotle, who emphasized observation and logical reasoning. During the Renaissance, figures such as Galileo and Francis Bacon advanced empirical methods, advocating for experimentation and systematic observation as essential components of scientific inquiry. The method evolved further in the 17th and 18th centuries, becoming more structured with the formulation of hypotheses, experimentation, and the analysis of results. Today, the scientific method is recognized as a rigorous process that underpins modern scientific research across disciplines.
How did the new scientific method that was developed in the 1500s and 1600s differ from the traditional approach to science?
The new scientific method focused on systematic observation, experimentation, hypothesis testing, and drawing conclusions based on evidence. This contrasted with the traditional approach that relied more on speculation, reliance on authority, and reasoning based on philosophical principles. The new method emphasized empirical evidence and reproducibility in order to arrive at more reliable and objective results.
