Main points of the big bang:
Some evidence for the big bang theory:
Red shift - When wavelength increases and causes light to move towards the red end of the spectrum. The further away an object the greater the red shift.
When you look at objects that contain various elements they absorb certain wavelengths of light in the spectrum; these show as black lines. If you look at a similar object in space that is further away the 'black lines' move towards the red end of the spectrum.
This supports point 1. If you tracked the galaxies back in time they would all go to that point.
CMB (Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation) - was created as high energy gamma radiation just after the big bang. It has been traveling through space since then. As the Universe has expanded, it stretched out to longer and longer wavelengths and is now microwave radiation. It is thought to be the left over heat - a bit like an 'echo' of the big bang.
This supports point 2.
no the no. of stars in the milky way is not the evidence in support of the big bang cosmology.
edwin hubble
There are two questions commonly asked:1. Is it real, or did God create the universe ex nihilo?2. Did the Big Bang create more than one universe?3. How can the big bang account for dark matter and dark energy?
It is not so much that the universe is expanding, but rather the rationalization for its expansion that provides evidence to support the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang supports interpreted observational evidence of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) barrier that there is an evolutionary expansion of the universe which promotes a finite age for the universe.
The redshift of galaxies is evidence for the Big Bang theory because it shows that the universe is expanding. When light from distant galaxies is redshifted, it means that those galaxies are moving away from us, indicating that the universe is getting larger and supporting the idea that everything originated from a single point in a massive explosion.
The red shift and the cosmic microwave background radiation was the evidence used to develop the big bang theory.
no the no. of stars in the milky way is not the evidence in support of the big bang cosmology.
yes it will happen again after the big crunch then of course, the big munch..... At present there is no evidence that another Big Bang will occur.
Some questions about the Big Bang theory and its implications for the origin of the universe include: What caused the Big Bang? How did the universe evolve after the Big Bang? What evidence supports the Big Bang theory? What are the implications of the Big Bang for our understanding of the universe's beginning and future?
No, it's the other way round. The Big Bang is responsible for the redshift.
He doesn't
edwin hubble
There are two questions commonly asked:1. Is it real, or did God create the universe ex nihilo?2. Did the Big Bang create more than one universe?3. How can the big bang account for dark matter and dark energy?
It is not so much that the universe is expanding, but rather the rationalization for its expansion that provides evidence to support the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang supports interpreted observational evidence of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) barrier that there is an evolutionary expansion of the universe which promotes a finite age for the universe.
The redshift of galaxies is evidence for the Big Bang theory because it shows that the universe is expanding. When light from distant galaxies is redshifted, it means that those galaxies are moving away from us, indicating that the universe is getting larger and supporting the idea that everything originated from a single point in a massive explosion.
the big bang theory
science