Fossil distribution supports the theory of continental drift by showing similar fossil species found on continents that are now separated by vast oceans. This suggests that the continents were once connected and have since drifted apart. The distribution of fossils across continents provides evidence for the movement of landmasses over time.
Two things that supports the continental drift theory are; 1. Fossil. 2. Continent Shapes.
Cynognathus is a good candidate for providing evidence for the continental drift theory because its fossil has been found in both South America and Africa, which were once connected in the supercontinent Gondwana. This distribution pattern supports the idea of continental drift, as it suggests that these continents were once joined together and later drifted apart.
Continental drift can affect fossil remains by causing them to be dispersed across different continents as landmasses move. It can also result in changes to the environmental conditions where fossils are found, impacting preservation and fossil formation processes. Additionally, the movement of continents can lead to the creation of new habitats or barriers, influencing the distribution and evolution of species.
Yes, fossil evidence such as similar plant and animal species found on separate continents has been used to support the continental drift hypothesis. The distribution of fossils across continents suggests that these land masses were once connected and later moved apart.
Fossil distribution supports the theory of continental drift by showing similar fossil species found on continents that are now separated by vast oceans. This suggests that the continents were once connected and have since drifted apart. The distribution of fossils across continents provides evidence for the movement of landmasses over time.
Two things that supports the continental drift theory are; 1. Fossil. 2. Continent Shapes.
Old answer: the scientists found them in the 2 regions andMesosaurus was significant in providing evidence for the theory of continental drift, because its remains were found in southern Africa and eastern South America, two far away places. As Mesosaurus was a small freshwater organism, and therefore could not have crossed the Atlantic Ocean, this distribution indicated that Africa and South America used to be joined together. Indeed, all the world's continents were joined into one supercontinent called Pangaea in the time Mesosaurus existed.
Fossil distribution supports the theory of continental drift by showing similar species of plants and animals that lived on different continents that are now separated by oceans. This suggests that these continents were once joined together and over time drifted apart to their current positions. The presence of identical fossils on continents that are now separated is evidence that they were once part of the same landmass.
Paleoclimatic evidence supporting continental drift includes the matching of certain rock formations, geological structures, and fossil distribution on continents now separated by vast oceans. For example, the presence of glacial deposits and coal seams that match across continents provides evidence that these landmasses were once connected. Additionally, the alignment of ancient climatic belts and the distribution of certain plant and animal species further support the theory of continental drift.
its when you have dinosaurs on the west side of Africa and fossils of dino's on the east side of south america.... yepp thats how it is.
Cynognathus is a good candidate for providing evidence for the continental drift theory because its fossil has been found in both South America and Africa, which were once connected in the supercontinent Gondwana. This distribution pattern supports the idea of continental drift, as it suggests that these continents were once joined together and later drifted apart.
Continental drift can affect fossil remains by causing them to be dispersed across different continents as landmasses move. It can also result in changes to the environmental conditions where fossils are found, impacting preservation and fossil formation processes. Additionally, the movement of continents can lead to the creation of new habitats or barriers, influencing the distribution and evolution of species.
Yes, fossil evidence such as similar plant and animal species found on separate continents has been used to support the continental drift hypothesis. The distribution of fossils across continents suggests that these land masses were once connected and later moved apart.
Fossils of similar plants and animals found on continents that are now widely separated suggest that these landmasses were once connected. The distribution of these fossils across different continents supports the theory of Pangaea, which posits that all current continents were once joined together in a supercontinent. This evidence helps explain how species were able to migrate and evolve across different landmasses before continental drift separated them.
index fossil
any fossil of wide geographical distribution and a short range in time