answersLogoWhite

0

Google it.. you should find something

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Did mill reject the divine command?

John Stuart Mill did not outright reject the concept of divine command, but he approached morality from a utilitarian perspective, emphasizing human reason and the consequences of actions rather than divine will. He believed that ethical principles should be based on their ability to promote happiness and reduce suffering, rather than adherence to religious doctrine. This focus on human welfare and rationality suggests a shift away from traditional divine command theories in ethics.


Divine command ethics vs reason-based deontological ethics vs vitual ethics vs ethical relativism?

Assuming you are asking what the difference between the three, Divine command ethics is the idea that all ethics are handed down from a supreme being to humans. This set of ethics includes everything that is right/wrong in the particular religion of the person in question. Reason-based deontological ethics are ethics based on obligations, such as the obligation to pay your taxes, to tell the truth, etc. Most ethics based on this system are derived from what benefits the society and the ideals of the society in question, leaving some of what is covered by divine command ethics up to the individuals opinion. An example of the differences between the two would be that in divine command ethics based off of Christianity, homosexuality is strictly wrong. In reason-based ethics, using the definition of society as simply a group of people, homosexuality is a question left to the person's opinions as it does not violate any obligations a person may have. Another example would be the question of divorce. In divine command ethics based off of Christianity, divorce is wrong. In Reason based ethics, as the act of divorce, if not the associated ordeals, harms no person, it does not violate any obligations a person may have, assuming that the society has a method in place for divorce. Ethical Relativism isn't so much a system of ethics as the idea that ethics change depending on the situation. Using this as an argument, one can claim that an act such as killing another person is not unethical if they are from a faction (country, tribe, religion, etc) that is at war with them. Ethical relativism is also applied in the idea of self-defense, as it is considered fine to harm a person if their actions jeopardize the safety of others. An extreme example of this would be the claim that stealing is no longer unethical if it is the only way for a person to survive.


Do All religious philosophers necessarily hold to the divine command theory of ethics?

Technically, NO. For Philosophers may try to teach people a religious philosophy of their own, but in reality they believe and act a totally different way. Most of the time they do have a theory of ethics.


What is the difference between ethics based on religious beliefs and ethics based on reason alone?

An ethics based on religious beliefs claims that right and wrong are determined by something supernatural or divine such as a god. As Plato argued, a problem with this view is that it seems to make right and wrong arbitrary. Must not the Divine have had a good reason to say that some acts are right and some acts are wrong? If the Divine did have such a good reason, then ethics is based on reason that is beyond the Divine; if the Divine did not have such a good reason, then ethics is arbitrary. .


What has the author Jean Porter written?

Jean Porter has written: 'Natural and Divine Law' 'Wings' 'Moral Action and Christian Ethics' 'Psychic development' -- subject(s): Parapsychology


What is the judge of the goddess argument?

The "judge of the goddess" argument is a philosophical thought experiment that questions the nature of moral authority and divine command. It posits a scenario where a deity commands an action that may seem morally questionable, prompting the question of whether morality is dictated by divine will or if there exists an independent moral standard that even the deity must adhere to. This argument highlights the tension between divine command theory and moral objectivism, raising important implications for ethics and theology. Ultimately, it seeks to explore the relationship between morality, human reason, and divine authority.


What are different between business ethics and religious ethics?

Business ethics refers to the principles and standards that guide behavior in the business environment, focusing on issues like fairness, accountability, and corporate responsibility. In contrast, religious ethics are based on moral principles derived from specific religious beliefs and teachings, often emphasizing spiritual values and the idea of divine command. While business ethics is typically secular and aims to promote trust and integrity in commerce, religious ethics may incorporate broader existential questions and community values. Ultimately, business ethics prioritize practical implications in a professional context, whereas religious ethics are rooted in faith and spiritual considerations.


How are business ethics related to personal ethics?

When a person has ethics in their every day lives, they will also have business ethics. They will ensure that they are making sound decisions when it comes to the organization.


How Silkwood the movie related to business ethics?

Whistleblowing!


What is Natural Ethics theory?

This being a subjective concept I would say natural moral law :)


Explain how ethics in business and the law are related How are they different?

Ethics is how you conduct yourself in business and law. Both of these need good ethics for people to trust and use your services.


What are the objects of ethics?

The material object of ethics consists of human acts and its' formal object is the moral rectitude of human actions in relation to our natural end.