The question is quite vague, as there are many chemical reactions and none are specified, so the two chemical reactions must be specified before an answer can be given.
With the rate at which stars emit energy, any chemical process would exhaust a stellar mass of reactants in a relatively short time, yet stars last millions to billions of years. The only conclusion is that stars are powered by something many times more energetic than any chemical process.
All of chemical reactions in cells breakdown molecules and make molecules.
The first reactant and last product are the same.
They are both The same. New Edit because Last one was not Nice.
An chemical element cannot loss a chemical element. Probable you think to the last member of a radioactive decay chain.
With the rate at which stars emit energy, any chemical process would exhaust a stellar mass of reactants in a relatively short time, yet stars last millions to billions of years. The only conclusion is that stars are powered by something many times more energetic than any chemical process.
All of chemical reactions in cells breakdown molecules and make molecules.
No, molecules do not last forever. They can undergo chemical reactions, break apart, or degrade over time due to various factors like exposure to light, heat, or other substances. The lifespan of a molecule depends on its chemical stability and the conditions in which it exists.
Atoms do not last forever in the universe. Over time, atoms can break apart or combine with other atoms through various processes, such as nuclear reactions or chemical reactions. This means that atoms can change and transform, rather than remaining unchanged indefinitely.
write down the formula for any substance entering into reaction.place the (+) sign between the formulas as needed and put the yield after the last one.
Electrons in the last orbit of an atom are called valence electrons. These electrons are involved in the formation of chemical bonds with other atoms, determining the atom's reactivity and ability to form compounds. The number of valence electrons influences the atom's behavior in chemical reactions.
No, inner electrons are not typically involved in chemical changes. They are tightly bound to the nucleus and do not participate in the bonding or interactions that drive chemical reactions. It is mainly the outer electrons, or valence electrons, that are involved in chemical changes.
they're both magnets . they can both stick to iron-made materials. They are different because temporary magnets only last a little and permanent magnets last a long time.
You can make a chemical reaction last longer by adjusting the concentration of reactants, controlling the temperature, using a catalyst, or providing continuous stirring. Additionally, increasing the surface area of reactants or using a pressure vessel can also help prolong the reaction.
Yes ,They are because they have the same last name.LOL :) Katrien
Generally speaking, heat increases the rate of chemical reactions; in the specific case of light sticks, it means they glow more brightly (and don't last as long).
The theory is what you are trying to prove by studying different types of reactions. A theory is a statement of belief. "The author intends to show that (blah blah blah) through the study of multiple reactions." Your theory is the LAST thing you'll write in your paper if possible.