Rulers created small kingdoms primarily through military conquest, strategic marriages, and alliances. By defeating rival tribes or neighboring territories, they expanded their influence and control. Additionally, forming alliances through marriage allowed rulers to strengthen their positions and consolidate power. Over time, these efforts led to the establishment of distinct political entities, each with its own governance and culture.
The two countries located in the Himalayas are Bhutan and Nepal
Britain was historically divided into four kingdoms by various tribal leaders and rulers, particularly during the early medieval period. The most notable divisions occurred after the fall of Roman Britain, leading to the establishment of the kingdoms of England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland. These divisions were influenced by a combination of tribal affiliations, territorial disputes, and the spread of Christianity. The process was gradual and involved various key figures, rather than a single individual.
To break apart a kingdom into smaller kingdoms, you could decentralize power and delegate authority to regional leaders or governors. Create autonomous regions within the kingdom and give them more control over their local affairs. This can help in fostering local governance and promoting diversity within the overall kingdom.
wde
I looked into this topic and as far as I can tell on the rare occasion that an organism doesn't fit into a kingdom they create a new one. However there are so many kingdoms that it is very unlikely that an organism won't fit into one.
monarchies
England was split into different kingdoms
The answer is in autocracies the rulers are not elected.
which rulers lead the kingdoms
which rulers lead the kingdoms
which rulers lead the kingdoms
which rulers lead the kingdoms
which rulers lead the kingdoms
which rulers lead the kingdoms
In Autocracies the rulers are not elected {nova net}
ddddf
There was no dynastic rulers because china split up into many small kingdoms during the warring states period