without producers cunsumers will die. without consumers producers will probably over populate
They are decomposer, producer, predator, consumer, prey I'm not to sure about prey and predator it cud be scavenger and predator instead!!
without producers, consumers would probaly die. without consumers, producers would probably over populate. So the thing they have in common is they both rely on each other. hope that helps. at least its better than hey listen who ever wrote "hey" i hope you see this and feel like a very bad person. Because you are and it is unkind to what you have done. my life depended on this answer. Now i would of wrote worst language here, but the site doesn't allow me. So I am mentally flicking you off. Good day.
Energy moves from producer to consumer levels through the consumption of plants by herbivores, which are then consumed by carnivores. Nutrients are also transferred through this food chain, as each organism utilizes some nutrients and passes on the rest when it is eaten by another organism. This process of energy and nutrient transfer continues up the food chain, with each level of consumer relying on the level below for sustenance.
0.1% ...because each level only gets 10% of the energy of the previous level (due to the second law of thermodynamics). Primary producer (100), primary consumer (10), secondary consumer (1), tertiary consumer (.1). This is also part of the reason food chains are limited to 3-5 trophic levels.
In the producer, energy is lost through growth, respiration and other life processes. It's the same in the consumer - excretion, respiration, movement, growth and other life processes all account for the vast amounts of energy that are lost in a food chain. This explains why food chains don't normally last longer than 4 stages - producer, consumer, secondary consumer and tertiary consumer.
producer consumer secondary consumer
producer then the firstly consumer then the secondly consumer then the predator
Producer, consumer, and decomposers
In economics, the opposite of a producer is a consumer. A producer makes a product, and a consumer uses the product that the producer makes. Both parts are essential to virtually all economic systems, regardless of how each part of the system is treated.
In order to sustain the ecological cycle on the earth the consumer heterotroph and producer autotroph need each other. They are all link to each other in the food web and food cycle prevailing on the earth.
The living organisms depend on each other for their food & shelter. EG: Fungi and algae depend on each other .
Producer provides goods , worker makes goods consumer uses goods
Because we need each other and we depend on each other .
Not really, no. They depend on each other for safety's sake from predators, but not for food.
family members depend one each other for support,emotions and social
Good question. Firstly, producers get their energy energy from the sun through photosynthesis, creating or producing nutrients in the plant. A herbivore consumer can then eat it getting it's nutrients so, consumers rely on producers for their food but decomposers rely on a carnivore or omnivore (consumer) to eat some species of a consumer. The decomposer, lets say a earth worm eats and consumes the rest of the animal breaking it down to it's core nutrients. So I guess you could say decomposers rely on carnivores/omnivores to kill each other and herbivores, and herbivores/omnivores rely on producers for nutrients to eat.
They relate to each other because they both depend on each other.