Yes of course. The gravity is the one responsible for keeping the satellite in place. But hold your horse how can that be possible. If the gravity was the only force acting then the satellite should start moving in a spiral fashion thereby crashing down on the earth surface. Here we see the action of something called the centrifugal force which is one of the famous pseudo forces.
Now what is a pseudo force? Well these are the forces which does not exist in reality. It is something which you assume to exist to counter balance the other force that is keeping you spinning called the centripetal force(like gravity in case of satellites). Even you feel this force like when you're standing inside a bus and the bus takes a sharp turn and you tilt the other way.
It isn't.
The first law states that an object in motion stays in motion unless acted upon by an external force. The meteor impact imparts an external force that changes the satellite's motion. The second law describes how force equals mass times acceleration, which means the satellite's mass and the force of the meteor impact determine the resulting acceleration. Finally, the third law states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, so the satellite exerts a force back on the meteor as it is knocked out of orbit.
they both are always making time and is always in motion
Its a matter of being scientifically rigorous. You can not claim the 2nd law as a law unless you first establish the first law.
newtons 2nd law states that if a force is put on an object then the object will move in the oppisite direction of the force no thats the third law
newtons third law
It isn't.
The first law states that an object in motion stays in motion unless acted upon by an external force. The meteor impact imparts an external force that changes the satellite's motion. The second law describes how force equals mass times acceleration, which means the satellite's mass and the force of the meteor impact determine the resulting acceleration. Finally, the third law states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, so the satellite exerts a force back on the meteor as it is knocked out of orbit.
It isn't closely related. Newton's Third Law is more closely related to conservation of MOMENTUM.
Force=mass*acceleration
they both are always making time and is always in motion
yes it is friction referring to newtons law F = ma Good luck
Yes. According to Newton's Second Law, there has to be an unbalanced force - otherwise, the satellite won't accelerate (in this case, change direction).
It states newtons law of gravitation
Its a matter of being scientifically rigorous. You can not claim the 2nd law as a law unless you first establish the first law.
mass, acceleration, motion - speed and velocity, newtons 1st law force = mass * acceleration speed requires force to change force acts on velocity to change it newtons 1st law describes force
As we pull the water, our bodies move forward. Thus, that is an opposite reaction from pulling.