They make around 100,000 a year :)
The history of the Big Bang theory began with the Big Bang's development from observations and theoretical considerations. Much of the theoretical work in cosmology now involves extensions and refinements to the basic Big Bang model.
The Big Bang theory postulates that the universe is expanding from an extremely hot and dense state. It does not necessarily say that this state was a singularity - but a singularity would have been consistent with Einstein's relativity theory. If it was indeed a singularity, then it would have been much smaller than a dot; much smaller even then a proton. In fact, it would have had no size at all.
It is not so much that the universe is expanding, but rather the rationalization for its expansion that provides evidence to support the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang supports interpreted observational evidence of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) barrier that there is an evolutionary expansion of the universe which promotes a finite age for the universe.
He didn't. Although Hawking has done an immense amount of theoretical work on black holes, as well as the topology of our Universe, he has always taken Big Bang Cosmology as his starting point. That's because, by the time he got his PhD in 1966, observational evidence had pretty much ruled out any cosmology but Big Bang. Hawking has simply improved our mathematical understanding of BBC.
There is no consensus on the perfect cosmological theory. The search for a theory that accurately describes the origin and evolution of the universe is an ongoing pursuit in astrophysics and cosmology. Theories such as the Big Bang theory and inflationary theory have provided significant insights, but there is still much that remains unknown.
There are nearly 18 million US viewers of Big Bang Theory episodes.
Hello, i am minakshi and the answer of your question is that the major astronomers that helped us arrive at the big bang theory is that george lemairte and freidmann .one thing more i like the big bang theory very much more question you can send me on big bang theory like my opinion on how the universe was created , how matter came into being etc.
bang bang choo choo train
They didn't; the big bang theory is just an idea or a theory, not a fact. The empirical evidence that our Universe was, 13.7 billion years ago, much more dense that it is now, is overwhelming. No other explanation even begins to explain what we observe in our Universe. Saying the Big Bang is a "just an idea or theory" is like saying gravity is "just an idea or a theory, not a fact."
The history of the Big Bang theory began with the Big Bang's development from observations and theoretical considerations. Much of the theoretical work in cosmology now involves extensions and refinements to the basic Big Bang model.
it shows how much the universe is expanding.
The current prevailing theory is the Big Bang theory, which posits that the universe began as a singularity around 13.8 billion years ago and has been expanding ever since. This theory is supported by various lines of evidence, such as the cosmic microwave background radiation and the observed expansion of the universe.
"Big Bang theory": * It is currently one of the better models that can account for what we observe as an expanding universe. * In order to account for some aspects of the size of the universe, we have to make some assumptions about the speed of light that do not seem to hold in the world as we now know it; in the first few moments after the 'big bang' light may have been able to travel at a velocity much greater than c. "Steady State Theory" * It was a widely held belief for centuries. * Current evidence seems to completely disprove the 'steady state' theory.
That's the primary problem with the big bang theory - the universe has been mapped back to a couple of billionths of a second after the big bang occurred and all the data from then and beyond fits perfectly with the predictions postulated by the big bang theory itself, but there are limits to how far back you can see. However, the conflicting theories miserably fail to provide an idea as to why the universe started either - religions state that there was a god beforehand, which is infinitely more complex than an explosion, the steady state theory in addition to being pretty much disproven requires that the universe was there to start with, and Occam's razor then leads to the big bang theory. It's the simplest explanation that makes sense, but no theory in existence has a satisfactory argument as to why the universe started in the first place.
There is currently no observational data that fundamentally conflicts with the Big Bang model. There are however some people that have trouble accepting the model: they are very much against it.
one thousand dollars
It is not so much that the universe is expanding, but rather the rationalization for its expansion that provides evidence to support the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang supports interpreted observational evidence of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) barrier that there is an evolutionary expansion of the universe which promotes a finite age for the universe.