Depends what you mean by "robust."
If you mean, "Are there any experimental observations that support or rule out string theory or any of its alternatives?", the answer is, "No -- an we can't even conceive of any way of doing so." It's not just a matter of building an accelerator ten times larger than CERN, or even a a million times larger than CERN -- an accelerator to test String Theory would have to be 10^14 times larger.
If you mean, "Is the mathematics of M-theory (a subset of the string theory paradigm) internally self-consistent?", the answer is "Yes."
If you mean, "Does M-theory unite gravity with quantum mechanics, a task no other hypothesis has been able to do?", the answer is "Yes."
If you mean, "Does M-theory predict a universe that is exactly like ours?", the answer is "Yes, but it also predicts 10^500 OTHER universes." In other words, if you assume that the math of M-theory correctly describes where we happen to exist, then you can end up not only with our Universe but just about any universe you could imagine -- and a few you COULDN'T imagine.
It may turn out that either (1) a future mathematician will be able to show that the math of M-theory predicts ONLY our Universe, or (2) maybe there really ARE 10^500 universe in our cosmos, and we just happen to be living in one of the few where intelligent life could exist.
Or we may find a way to experimentally test string theory and find it either verified or refuted.
At this point, we just don't know.
A hypothesis must be tested and replicated many times by different researchers, with the consistent same result, before it can be considered a scientific theory. The process involves peer review and validation to ensure that the results are reliable and robust. Ultimately, a hypothesis can only become a scientific law if it is proven to be universally true under certain conditions.
No a hypothesis is not the same thing as a theory, but they are very similar. A hypothesis is an educated guess as to how an experiment will turn out, and a theory is an explanation for why something happens the way it does( for a theory to become a theory the same results must be produced multiple times.)
An explanation supported by a reliable body of data refers to a conclusion or theory that is backed by extensive and credible evidence from various sources or studies. This data provides robust support for the explanation, making it more trustworthy and likely to be true.
Alfred Wegener's idea of continental drift was considered a theory because it lacked a detailed mechanism to explain how continents move, and it was met with skepticism due to a lack of evidence at the time. It was later supported by the discovery of plate tectonics, providing a more robust explanation for the movement of continents.
Later evidence from genetics and molecular biology showed that acquired traits are not passed down through generations as proposed by Lamarck, as they do not alter the genetic material. On the other hand, Darwin's theory of natural selection was supported by the discovery of the mechanism of inheritance through genes and DNA, providing a more robust explanation for evolutionary change over time.
A hypothesis must be tested and replicated many times by different researchers, with the consistent same result, before it can be considered a scientific theory. The process involves peer review and validation to ensure that the results are reliable and robust. Ultimately, a hypothesis can only become a scientific law if it is proven to be universally true under certain conditions.
Moti Lal Tiku has written: 'Robust inference' -- subject(s): Estimation theory, Nonparametric statistics, Robust statistics
Osama Abdelaziz Hussein has written: 'Robust estimation for the mean of skewed distributions' -- subject(s): Robust statistics, Estimation theory
No a hypothesis is not the same thing as a theory, but they are very similar. A hypothesis is an educated guess as to how an experiment will turn out, and a theory is an explanation for why something happens the way it does( for a theory to become a theory the same results must be produced multiple times.)
Yes, hypotheses should be supported by evidence to be considered valid. Evidence helps to confirm or refute the hypothesis, guiding further research and understanding of the subject. In scientific inquiry, robust evidence strengthens the credibility of the hypothesis and contributes to the development of knowledge. Ultimately, without evidence, a hypothesis remains speculative and unsubstantiated.
Because it offers us a robust framework for explaining many observations in biology and palaeontology.
A theory that has been successfully tested repeatedly and has stood the test of time is generally referred to as a well-established or robust theory. This term indicates that the theory has consistently shown to be valid and reliable across multiple experiments and observations in various conditions.
The word robust is an adjective, a word to describe a noun as strong, healthy, or successful: robust health, a robust economy, a robust business.The noun form for the adjective is robustness.
An explanation supported by a reliable body of data refers to a conclusion or theory that is backed by extensive and credible evidence from various sources or studies. This data provides robust support for the explanation, making it more trustworthy and likely to be true.
Robust Redhorse was created in 1870.
Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection has been widely accepted in the scientific community and has provided a robust framework for understanding the diversity of life on Earth. Over time, new evidence in genetics, paleontology, and comparative anatomy has continued to support and refine the principles of evolutionary theory.
In science, a theory is a well-substantiated explanation based on evidence and testing. The ideas about evolution are called theories because they have been extensively researched, tested, and supported by a wide range of scientific evidence from various fields such as genetics, paleontology, and comparative anatomy. Evolutionary theory is considered one of the most robust and well-supported theories in biology.