The Big Bang Theory is very well accepted by the scientific community; it is considered to be solidly supported, and it is regarded as the best theory that we presently have, to explain the origin of the universe as we know it.
The Big Bang theory is widely accepted in the scientific community as the most plausible explanation for the origins of the universe. While there may be ongoing debates and refinements to the theory, it has not been rejected as a whole.
It depends, because some might say 'scientists'. But not all scientists believe in this theory. Also, there are those who believe in a similar idea to the Big Bang, but it is not refered to as 'The Big Band Theory.'
Hello i am minakshi answer is that the big bang theory is an example of old scientific theory as big bang theory explains that there was an explosion but the isotropy and the homogenity of the universe is not explained by big bang theory to explain his we connect inflatation theory with big bang theory to explain it so the big bang theory is also an example of old scientific theory.
There are various scientific theories about the origins of matter, but the Big Bang theory is the most widely accepted explanation for the early moments of the universe. If the Big Bang theory were to be proven false, it would require a new, evidence-based theory to explain the creation of matter. However, as of now, the Big Bang theory remains the prevailing scientific understanding of the universe's origins.
The Big Bang theory is not considered an outdated theory; rather, it remains the prevailing cosmological model explaining the origin and evolution of the universe. Supported by a wealth of evidence, including cosmic microwave background radiation and the observed expansion of the universe, it has been refined over time as new data emerges. While scientific theories can evolve, the Big Bang theory continues to be validated by ongoing research and observations, maintaining its status within the scientific community.
The Big Bang theory is widely accepted in the scientific community as the most plausible explanation for the origins of the universe. While there may be ongoing debates and refinements to the theory, it has not been rejected as a whole.
It depends, because some might say 'scientists'. But not all scientists believe in this theory. Also, there are those who believe in a similar idea to the Big Bang, but it is not refered to as 'The Big Band Theory.'
It is the majorly accepted scientific theory for how the universe began; what actually happened will never be known for sure.
The so-called big bang was set off by the Divine Creator, or both can accept it as it is; a theory that cannot be proven as no observation or repeatable experiment is possible. Let's see what hate-mail I get from "open minded" athesits for saying that.
Hello i am minakshi answer is that the big bang theory is an example of old scientific theory as big bang theory explains that there was an explosion but the isotropy and the homogenity of the universe is not explained by big bang theory to explain his we connect inflatation theory with big bang theory to explain it so the big bang theory is also an example of old scientific theory.
There are various scientific theories about the origins of matter, but the Big Bang theory is the most widely accepted explanation for the early moments of the universe. If the Big Bang theory were to be proven false, it would require a new, evidence-based theory to explain the creation of matter. However, as of now, the Big Bang theory remains the prevailing scientific understanding of the universe's origins.
The Big Bang theory is not considered an outdated theory; rather, it remains the prevailing cosmological model explaining the origin and evolution of the universe. Supported by a wealth of evidence, including cosmic microwave background radiation and the observed expansion of the universe, it has been refined over time as new data emerges. While scientific theories can evolve, the Big Bang theory continues to be validated by ongoing research and observations, maintaining its status within the scientific community.
No, it is scientific theory
No one knows exactly why the universe was not made single after the Big Bang. The Big Bang is actually only a single theory on the creation of the universe and is not considered to be scientific fact.Comments: 1) Maybe it's just me, but I don't really understand this question. 2) The Big Bang Theory is, at present, accepted as "scientific fact".Of course, like all scientific theories, it could be proved wrong in the future.
it started because of the scientific theory of The Big Bang it started because of the scientific theory of The Big Bang
Yes, the Big Bang theory is the most widely accepted scientific model for the universe's beginnings. It posits that the universe began as a hot, dense state and has been expanding and cooling down over billions of years. This theory is supported by evidence such as the cosmic microwave background radiation and the observed redshift of galaxies.
The Big Bang is the theory that was developed to describe the origins of the universe.