It depends on the case. I would think not, because this is only evidence that you were at the scene of a crime, it does not mean you actually did anything bad or illegal. Most likely they can say you are a witness and or suspect, but that is not engough solid evidence to put you in jail. There needs to be something to directly link you with the illegal act (video tape, witness, etc.).
Not necessarily. It would depend on how much other evidence there is. By itself, DNA on a cigarette only proves that the suspect was physically present at the scene of the crime. It proves he was there at some unknown time, but it does not prove that he was there during the commission of the crime or that he committed the crime. It is a compelling piece of evidence, but it would need to be accompanied by other evidence, in order to ensure a conviction. For example, if eyewitnesses saw the suspect's car fleeing the scene, and if bullets matching those used in the crime were found at the suspect's home, THAT, combined with the DNA on the cigarette, would probably be enough to convict.
Yes, Crime Scene Investigators use chromatography to analyze and identify substances found at crime scenes. Chromatography helps separate and detect chemical compounds in a sample, such as drugs or accelerants, aiding in the investigation and solving of crimes.
I dont know about other states, but in Illinois you have to be a police officer for 2 years before you can become a crime scene investigator. I don't know about other states, but in Illinois you have to be a police officer for 2 years before becoming a crime scene investigator.
The crime scene investigators use the biotechnology and genetis technology for solving their case. They collect every sample from the crime scene and perform the laboratory tests on it which gives them clue about what would have happened on the crime scene and then DNA and the fingerprints are used to prove the identity of the person associated with crime scene
Chromatography could be used in investigating a crime because it can separate and analyze complex mixtures of substances, such as drugs, poisons, or chemicals found at a crime scene. By identifying and comparing different compounds in samples, chromatography can provide valuable evidence to link suspects, victims, or locations to a crime.
Anything found at a crime scene is considered evidence.
A piece of fingernail found at the crime scene
Not necessarily. It would depend on how much other evidence there is. By itself, DNA on a cigarette only proves that the suspect was physically present at the scene of the crime. It proves he was there at some unknown time, but it does not prove that he was there during the commission of the crime or that he committed the crime. It is a compelling piece of evidence, but it would need to be accompanied by other evidence, in order to ensure a conviction. For example, if eyewitnesses saw the suspect's car fleeing the scene, and if bullets matching those used in the crime were found at the suspect's home, THAT, combined with the DNA on the cigarette, would probably be enough to convict.
Crime scene investigators document and analyze information found at crime scenes.
in my idea detective or police officer are responsible in crime i mean the role of a detective is so important, he goes to the crime scene,searches foe the clues and evidences,talks to the witnesses and finally he can say who ia guilty?
Not necessarily DNA match could mean the person was there before but it does not necessarily mean they were part of the crime
The primary crime scene is where the initial criminal activity or incident took place. It is usually the location where the most significant evidence related to the crime can be found. Proper documentation and preservation of the primary crime scene are essential for a thorough investigation.
Johnny is guilty because the evidence presented clearly shows his involvement in the crime. Witnesses identified him at the scene, and his fingerprints were found on the weapon used. Additionally, his alibi was weak and contradicted by surveillance footage. Collectively, these factors establish a compelling case against him.
Yes, there is the primary crime scene and the secondary crime scene. For example, if a body was found in a trash can but there is no evidence that the person was killed there then it means the person was killed somewhere else. The primary crime scene is where the person was killed and the secondary crime scene is where the body was dumped.
The original location of a crime or accident is known as the primary crime scene. This is where the initial event took place and where key evidence is likely to be found.
In almost all cases, no. You would not be guilty, but if you saw what happened, you are a witness.Another View: The above is true only if you were truly an un-involved witness who just happened to be at the scene when the crime went down.HOWEVER - if you were there accompanying the person or persons who committed the offense, YES - you could be charged as an accessory.
The mountain lion print found at the scene of the crime is significant because it could indicate the presence of a wild animal near the crime scene. This could potentially provide important clues about the circumstances surrounding the crime and help investigators piece together what happened.