answersLogoWhite

0

yes

answ2. YES, but. Accident is the wrong word, 'by chance' is a better one.

But the chance is not completely open.

If for example you put a lot of chlorine atoms and a lot of sodium atoms in a container, what would be the output? (Well, ignoring the vigour of the reaction for the moment.)

From a 'simple chance' point of view you would expect some NaCl, some Na2Cl5, Na3Cl6 and so on, for these combinations are all valid under simple chance.

But we both know that we'd only get NaCl. No fancy molecules.

For the nature of the elements concerned is such that they can only make the one style of molecule.

But this restriction is not so for carbon say, where we may have many organic compounds formed from O, C, and H. But with the same magic of electron bonds.

And whilst on the subject of Carbon, it was believed that it needed three Helium atoms coming together virtually simultaneously, to create an atom of carbon. And at an energy of 100 million K.* It was known that in the early phases of the beginning of the Big Bang, that due to its rapid expansion, there would not have been sufficient time to create the known carbon. As it quickly expanded it would cool equally quickly.

Later studies show that indeed such temperatures were available in the explosion of a super nova. Thus the C was created, and flung out into space as the nova spread.

* [note that at an atom or molecule level temperature is equivalent to particle velocity.]

BTW, Fred Hoyle who created the name Big Bang, was also a force in discovering the nucleosynthesis by which carbon could be made.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Natural Sciences

How were humans created by the big bang theory?

The Big Bang theory deals with large-scale aspects, and with the early development of the Universe. The creation of life on Earth, and perhaps on other planets, is not part of the Big Bang theory.


What would've happened if the big bang never took place?

If the Big Bang never took place, the universe as we know it would not exist. The universe began as a singularity and expanded rapidly from that point. Without this event, there would be no galaxies, stars, planets, or life as we know it.


Did god made the planets and suns or the bigbang?

It is impossible it PROVE or DISPROVE the existence of God. Belief in God is a mater of FAITH not science; Thus as the Big Bang, and formation of planets and Suns is a matter of SCIENTIFIC research and not FAITH, it is impossible to provide you with an answer. If you believe in God then it is correct for you to assume that God ultimately created everything. If you do not believe in God then, by definition, God did not create the Big Bang, and form planets and Suns.


How did the big bang form the planets?

After the Big Bang 13.8 billion years ago, the universe rapidly expanded and cooled. Gravity then caused matter to clump together in clouds, eventually forming stars and galaxies. Planets formed from leftover materials in the disc surrounding young stars. The process involved accretion, where particles collided and stuck together to build up larger bodies, leading to the formation of planets.


Is the number of stars in the Milky Way Galaxy evidence in support of Big Bang Cosmology?

no the no. of stars in the milky way is not the evidence in support of the big bang cosmology.

Related Questions

Are stars and planets formed after the Big Bang?

Everything happened after the big bang.


Who did space start?

It started with the big bang. This created the stars and planets


What does the big bang theory and antimatter have in common?

Scientists "speculate" that the Big Bang created antimatter, but it was destroyed when coming into contact with stars, planets, and other matter.


Why do we have stars and sky?

After the big bang when the temperature of the universe cooled down, the gases combined to form matter in the form of planets.


What did planets do to form red shift and big bang?

Nothing at all. Planets are cosmic afterthoughts, mere crumbs left over from the birth of the universe and that stars and galaxies that fill it.


Were stars formed before the planets?

Yes. Planets orbit around the stars, so the stars must have preceded the planets. Additionally, our concept of the "big bang" implies that the early universe was composed of 98% or more hydrogen, a percent and a bit as helium, and "everything else" as about 1%. All of the heavier solid elements were created in supernova explosions in the cores of massive stars.


Is there a reason why can't the star's be part of the solar system?

cause there is more stars than planets and stars is only a rock that burned from a planet,and cause of the big bang explosion its creats the galaxy and stars


How were humans created by the big bang theory?

The Big Bang theory deals with large-scale aspects, and with the early development of the Universe. The creation of life on Earth, and perhaps on other planets, is not part of the Big Bang theory.


How do the planets revolving around a star get there speed?

It all started with the Big Bang. All the matter created from the Big Bang eventually formed planets and every thing else. From the moment matter was created during the Big Bang the matter was expanding and moving really fast. So eventually all the planets and stars and galaxies that were formed started to spin around each other from the velocity that was created.


How many planets were believed to be formed in the big bang theory?

The big bang theory has nothing to do with the formation of planets.


How many stars existed on the beginning of the Universe?

If the big-bang theory is true, the stars, planets, and other universal bodies were progressively formed, so there were much less stars than we have today, and the fomation of new stars is compensated by the death of others.


What year that all the planets don't exist?

Probably several tens to hundreds of millions of years following the Big bang. Afterwards, planets formed around stars and became a permanent feature of the Universe.