no they arent similar
SCl3. It is polar because it has a lone pair on the central atom.
The bond between carbon and chlorine is more polar than the bond between carbon and sulfur. To compare bond polarities, compare the difference in the electronegativities between the atoms. The difference between carbon (with an electronegativity of 2.55) and sulfur (2.58) is 0.03. The difference between carbon (2.55) and chlorine (3.16) is 0.61. Since the difference between C and Cl is larger than the difference between C and S, the C-Cl bond is more polar.
Chlorine (Cl) has a larger ionic radius than sulfur (S) when comparing their anions, specifically the chloride ion (Cl⁻) and the sulfide ion (S²⁻). The ionic radius of Cl⁻ is approximately 181 picometers, while the ionic radius of S²⁻ is about 184 picometers. Additionally, phosphorus (P) in its anionic form (P³⁻) also has a larger ionic radius than sulfur.
Cs has a lower ionisation energy than Na.Cs has more electrons (44 more electron) than Na. The electrons in the outer electronshell are further away from the positive nucleus because there are many more electron shells.Because the valence electrons are further from the nucleus they are not held as tightly by the atom, this means that it takes less energy to remove the electron in the outer electron shell from Cs.So it is more reactive.
The S-Cl bond is polar. The electronegativity difference between S and Cl is 0.58, which means it is polar.
SCl3. It is polar because it has a lone pair on the central atom.
The S-Cl bond is more polar than the Br-Cl bond. This is because sulfur (S) is more electronegative than bromine (Br), leading to a greater electronegativity difference between sulfur and chlorine (Cl) compared to bromine and chlorine. This larger electronegativity difference results in a more polar bond.
Chlorine would be expected to be more reactive than phosphorus because it is higher in the periodic table and has a higher electronegativity, making it more likely to gain electrons in a chemical reaction.
Se-Cl bonds
The bond between carbon and chlorine is more polar than the bond between carbon and sulfur. To compare bond polarities, compare the difference in the electronegativities between the atoms. The difference between carbon (with an electronegativity of 2.55) and sulfur (2.58) is 0.03. The difference between carbon (2.55) and chlorine (3.16) is 0.61. Since the difference between C and Cl is larger than the difference between C and S, the C-Cl bond is more polar.
The bond between sulfur (S) and chlorine (Cl) is a covalent bond, specifically a polar covalent bond. This means that the electrons are shared unequally between the atoms, with chlorine being more electronegative than sulfur.
Chlorine (Cl) has a larger ionic radius than sulfur (S) when comparing their anions, specifically the chloride ion (Cl⁻) and the sulfide ion (S²⁻). The ionic radius of Cl⁻ is approximately 181 picometers, while the ionic radius of S²⁻ is about 184 picometers. Additionally, phosphorus (P) in its anionic form (P³⁻) also has a larger ionic radius than sulfur.
Compare their atomic sizes; the bond strength is determined by the amount of "overlap" between their orbitals. What shapes give you the most overlap?
A polar bond occurs when there is an unequal sharing of electrons between two atoms due to differences in electronegativity. In the given examples: F-F and Cl-Cl bonds are nonpolar because they have identical atoms sharing electrons. H-F and H-Cl bonds are polar due to the difference in electronegativity between hydrogen and fluorine/chlorine. P-S bond may be polar or nonpolar depending on the electronegativity of phosphorus and sulfur.
No. Chlorine is generally thought to be more electronegative than carbon. (However, there is some theoretical evidence for S(CH3)6 - hexamethyl persulfurane, which is predicted to be stable. Silico experiments reveal that, in this compound the negative charges will be located in the carbon atoms. So it is possible that, in Cl(CH3)3 or even Cl(CH3)5, Carbon may be more electronegative.)
Cs has a lower ionisation energy than Na.Cs has more electrons (44 more electron) than Na. The electrons in the outer electronshell are further away from the positive nucleus because there are many more electron shells.Because the valence electrons are further from the nucleus they are not held as tightly by the atom, this means that it takes less energy to remove the electron in the outer electron shell from Cs.So it is more reactive.
yes. ZnSO4(s) + Pb(s) ---> Zn(s) + PbSO4(s) also if this reaction were to take place with a Pb4+ ion then it would appear like this; 2 ZnSO4(s) + Pb(s) ---> 2 Zn(s) + Pb(SO4)2(s) either way lead can react with it. The only thing that may be incorrect about this balanced equation is that i dont believe this is one of the few reactions that fully react. It probably sits in equilibrium, which you mostly learn about in higher level chemistry. (the equilibrium arrow is basically two half arrows sitting on top of one another pointing in opposite directions.)