Yes, there is evidence supporting Catastrophe Theory in various fields such as physics, ecology, and economics. For example, in physics, studies on bifurcations and phase transitions demonstrate manifestations of Catastrophe Theory. In ecology, the theory has been used to explain sudden shifts in ecosystems. Additionally, applications in economics have shown how small changes in parameters can lead to drastic shifts in market behavior.
The theory is based on replicable evidence. This evidence turns a theory into a fact.
Yes, a theory should be supported by evidence in order to be considered valid and credible. Evidence helps to substantiate the claims and predictions made by a theory, allowing for testing, verification, and refinement of the theory as needed.
A scientific theory is supported by evidence. Without evidence, it is only a hypothesis.
The evidence of cosmic microwave background radiation supports the Big Bang theory.
A lack of evidence would weaken any theory. But the well known asteroids have well defined orbits.
Toba catastrophe theory happened in 000.
The Catastrophe Theory is a mathematics based theory. It was originated by a French mathematician Rene Thom in the 1960's and became more popular in the 1970's.
Cell Theory
A common theory is a theory which has not been proven or a theory without evidence.
The theory is based on replicable evidence. This evidence turns a theory into a fact.
Yes, a theory should be supported by evidence in order to be considered valid and credible. Evidence helps to substantiate the claims and predictions made by a theory, allowing for testing, verification, and refinement of the theory as needed.
A scientific theory is supported by evidence. Without evidence, it is only a hypothesis.
A hypothesis is a statement of theory. Something that is unproven. You gather evidence to support that theory. Gather enough evidence to support and a theory becomes accepted as fact.
If your issues are on the table, then it would be apparent that empirical evidence would trump theory, if the theory on the table were not proven to be true. If the theory were proven to be true, and the empirical evidence does not agree with the theory, then more experimentation would be necessary to determine the validity of the theory.
For their own benefits.
The evidence of cosmic microwave background radiation supports the Big Bang theory.
a huge catastrophe