Not really, but scientist are attempting to develop a quantum computer which, in theory could run a bunch of processes all at once at a speed that is faster than or as fast as the speed of light. Whether they could get this to work (currently the only calculations they can get these computers to do are simple division and multiplication) and if they could ever get the computers to be a functional size (the current ones are really big) is unknown.
No. Nothing can travel faster than light.
No known particles can travel faster than the speed of light in a vacuum, according to the theory of special relativity. In a medium like water, particles such as neutrinos can travel faster than the speed of light in that medium, but not in a vacuum. In solids, sound waves can propagate faster than light as well.
Probably, since there are star explosions all the time. Please note that no information travels FASTER than light, so we have no way of knowing in advance, unless we see a star that is about to explode, and correctly guess this fact.
Theoretically there exist hypothetical particles called tachyons which can travel faster than the speed of light.
Light is faster than sound. Light travels through empty space at a speed of about 186,282 miles per second (299,792 kilometers per second), whereas sound travels through air at about 1,125 feet per second (343 meters per second).
Not really, but scientist are attempting to develop a quantum computer which, in theory could run a bunch of processes all at once at a speed that is faster than or as fast as the speed of light. Whether they could get this to work (currently the only calculations they can get these computers to do are simple division and multiplication) and if they could ever get the computers to be a functional size (the current ones are really big) is unknown.
Because there is no communication between the photons. This the foundation of the EPR paradox but was resolved by Bell's Inequality.
It rots faster in the light.
faster light is red color light
The FTL paradox is a theoretical problem that arises when considering the possibility of faster-than-light (FTL) travel. It challenges our understanding of physics because it suggests that traveling faster than the speed of light could lead to paradoxes, such as time travel or violations of causality. This paradox raises questions about the fundamental principles of the universe and the limitations of our current scientific knowledge.
Whenever you ask if something is fast, you must always have a point of reference. Is a bicycle fast? Is a Ferrari fast? Is the Concorde jet fast? Is light fast? Is an AMD processor the fastest type of processor available? No. Is an AMD processor faster than an Intel processor of the same price? Probably. Is an AMD 5x86 faster than an Intel Xeon? Heck, no! Is an AMD Phenom faster than a Pentium 4? Yes.
No plane is faster than light.
There is nothing that travels faster than light.
It rots faster in the light.
Yes -- the Gameboy Advance Wormlight is an inexpensive way to enable low-light gaming.
No. As Einstein said, you cannnot travel at or faster than the speed of light as 1kg of mass needs 9x1016 joules of energy which would need a lot of fuel, which in turn would in crease the rate making the possibility of going at the speed oflight physically impossible unless you weigh nothing. :)
Light is what humans process faster