Well, the most common and liable explanation is that semen was poured into the mouth. Once the anus was visible then the real reasons were clear. So basically you can see a clear pattern in nature. Puting the large engorged penis into the vagina will cause climax.
Lmfao whoever said that man, i was looking for an actual answer!
The term that describes an observed pattern in nature without any attempt to explain it is "empirical observation." These observations are based on direct experience or experiments and serve as the foundational data that can lead to theories or explanations in scientific inquiry.
No, a scientific law does not attempt to explain an observed pattern in nature; rather, it describes a consistent and universal relationship that has been observed under specific conditions. Laws summarize the results of repeated experiments and observations, often expressed mathematically, while scientific theories provide explanations for why those patterns occur. In essence, laws tell us what happens, but theories explain how and why it happens.
A phenomenon describes an observed pattern in nature without an attempt to explain its underlying causes.
False
scientific law
The term that describes an observed pattern in nature without any attempt to explain it is "empirical observation." These observations are based on direct experience or experiments and serve as the foundational data that can lead to theories or explanations in scientific inquiry.
Yes.
A phenomenon describes an observed pattern in nature without an attempt to explain its underlying causes.
False
True. Unlike a scientific theory, a scientific model describes an observed pattern in nature without attempting to explain it.
scientific law
The main similarity between scientific theories and scientific laws is that both are supported by extensive evidence and are used to explain natural phenomena. However, theories are broader explanations that can be modified or refined based on new evidence, while laws are specific statements that describe a consistent pattern observed in nature.
help a firend out
Scientist used abstract reasoning to explain how something happened.
A theory cannot become a law because they are different aspects of scientific understanding. Theories are comprehensive explanations that incorporate observations and evidence, while laws are concise statements that describe a specific relationship or pattern in nature. Laws do not explain why phenomena occur, which is the role of theories.
Scientist used abstract reasoning to explain how something happened.
A scientific law describes a consistent pattern or relationship observed in nature, while a scientific theory explains why and how that pattern or relationship occurs. Laws are generally more specific and precise, providing a mathematical description, while theories are broader explanations based on evidence and experimentation.