I assume the question is why we spend so much money putting telescopes in orbit when we have ground-based telescopes.
The answer is because the atmosphere creates a lot of distortions that limits how far our telescopes can see, and what they can see.
Astronomers, as all scientists, are explorers; they are not content to keep looking at the same objects with the same level of detail over and over. It is much like the way so many people like HD television over old analog t.v. ... when looking out into space and distant stars, the atmosphere creates distortions and cannot see very well during the daylight (just as you cannot see stars during daylight). The problem is getting worse by the problem of light pollution -- all those security and traffic lights on all night long in cities creates a glow of light that makes stargazing even more difficult, even at night. By putting telescopes into space, they are no longer hindered by atmospheric distortions and are unaffected by light pollution from our cities. A telescope in space versus on the ground is analagous to an H.D. television versus an old analog t.v. -- there is much more you can see, and what you can see is in greater detail.
Yes, telescopes in space, such as the Hubble Space Telescope, are able to capture extremely clear images of objects in deep space. These telescopes are not affected by the distortion caused by Earth's atmosphere, resulting in sharper and more detailed images compared to ground-based telescopes.
Their eyes, ground-based telescopes, space telescopes.
Scientists use telescopes, specifically large ground-based telescopes and space telescopes like the Hubble Space Telescope, to study Eris. These telescopes allow them to observe Eris' size, shape, surface features, and composition.
reflecting and refracting telescopes
No, radio telescopes and refracting telescopes have different designs and functions. Radio telescopes are designed to detect radio waves from space, whereas refracting telescopes use lenses to bend light to create images of distant objects. While both types of telescopes have a common goal of observing the universe, their designs are optimized for different wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation.
All space telescopes are unmanned - unless you want to count the small telescopes on the Shuttle or IIS as space telescopes.
Radio signals are sent from Earth, to operate the telescopes.
Telescopes are used to see things that are far away from earth. Using telescopes we can see things that are millions of miles away. Most of the telescopes are on Earth but some of them are in space such as the Hubble Space Telescope.
Ground-based telescopes, and space telescopes. Or: refracting telescopes (main collector is a lens), and reflecting telescopes (main collector is a mirror). Or: Home telescopes (small ones), and professional ones (larger and more expensive).
Because light is absorbed and disturbed as it passes through air ... effects that ground-based telescopes have to live with but Hubble doesn't.
they use space probes,satellites,and of coarse,telescopes.
Yes, telescopes in space, such as the Hubble Space Telescope, are able to capture extremely clear images of objects in deep space. These telescopes are not affected by the distortion caused by Earth's atmosphere, resulting in sharper and more detailed images compared to ground-based telescopes.
Their eyes, ground-based telescopes, space telescopes.
hubble space station
light telescopes and radio telescopes whether installed on earth or on space vehicles
Scientists use telescopes, specifically large ground-based telescopes and space telescopes like the Hubble Space Telescope, to study Eris. These telescopes allow them to observe Eris' size, shape, surface features, and composition.
They have changed because now there is a telescope in space called the "Hubble". I can see things that regular telescopes on Earth cannot see.