0
What else can I help you with?
Scientific laws have stood the test of time and they will not change?
Scientific laws are based on repeated observations and evidence, so they are considered unlikely to change. However, they can be updated or refined based on new discoveries or insights, as our understanding of the natural world evolves.
An explanation that is based on prior scientific research or observations and that can be tested?
A scientific explanation is a hypothesis derived from existing research or observations that can be tested through experiments or further observation. It must be based on empirical evidence and subject to scrutiny and validation by the scientific community. By testing the explanation, scientists can determine its validity and refine our understanding of the natural world.
The formation of hypotheses that is central to the scientific method is an activity involving?
The formation of hypotheses in the scientific method involves generating testable explanations or predictions based on observations or prior knowledge. It is a critical step in setting up controlled experiments to investigate the validity of the hypothesis and ultimately draw scientific conclusions.
What is claim in scientific method?
A claim in the scientific method refers to a statement asserting a relationship between two or more variables. This statement is based on evidence and analysis of data collected through experimentation or observation. Claims must be supported by evidence and subject to rigorous testing to determine their validity.
What is the definition of a scientific statement?
A statement that satisfies ALL SIX criteria on the CONPTT grid....Consistent,Observable, Natural, Predictable, Testable, Tentative
Is scientific law based on scientific evidence?
Scientific laws are based on scientific experiments, scientific conclusions after exhaustive tests, and they are also based on formerly scientific discoveries and experiments. Scientific evidence without a conclusive proof may be a false evidence. Scientific evidence doesn't exist. Science is not based on evidences, but on real results originated from a theory. Results are solid, palpable, real and cannot be doubted.
How can you destroy the scientific law?
Scientific laws are based on thorough testing and evidence, so they cannot be destroyed. However, they can be revised or updated based on new experimental discoveries or observations that do not align with the current understanding. This process helps improve the accuracy and reliability of scientific laws over time.
What were much of Islam's scientific advancements based on?
Most of Islam's scientific advancements were made using a basis in Ancient Greek and Roman discoveries.
Is it true scientific models are based on current knowledge which can limit their effectiveness when new discoveries are made?
TRUE
How do recent scientific discoveries compare to discoveries made three hundred to five hundred years ago?
The scientific discoveries of age were based on very little information. Scientists had to Gage their discoveries on educated guess, theories, and exploration. Whereas, the recent discoveries are mostly found during analysis and exploration of past studies. They are evolved questions to existing answers.
Scientific and technological Discoveries are accepted if their evdicence can be?
Scientific and technological discoveries are accepted if their evidence can be empirically validated through rigorous experimentation, observation, and analysis. Consistent replication of results by multiple researchers and the ability to make predictions based on the discovery also contribute to its acceptance within the scientific community.
How is the scientific revolution connected to the enlightenment?
Connections to Scientific Revolution: The Enlightenment was a program to reform political, economic, and social aspects of European life by using the Scientific method established during the Scientific Revolution. The movement was based on the discoveries and knowledge of the Scientific Revolution.
What are some scientific studies showing the validity of psychic readings?
There are no scientific studies showing the validity of psychic readings. The reason for this is because there is no scientific proof that it is legitimate. You can read reviews from people who have stories of it working for them, but that is all the proof you can get.
How can I prove the validity of this hypothesis?
To prove the validity of a hypothesis, you can conduct experiments, collect data, analyze results, and draw conclusions based on evidence. It is important to use reliable methods and ensure that your findings are reproducible by others in the scientific community.
Where can news on the latest space discoveries be found?
The most up to date news on space discoveries can be found at the website of NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). NASA is the leading group in space discoveries, and most space trips based around scientific discovery come from them.
Scientific laws have stood the test of time and they will not change?
Scientific laws are based on repeated observations and evidence, so they are considered unlikely to change. However, they can be updated or refined based on new discoveries or insights, as our understanding of the natural world evolves.
What does scientific inquiry refer to?
Scientific inquiry refers to that you cannot answer questions based on opinions, values, or judgment. yes but you have to have evidence
