0
What else can I help you with?
Why did most scientists originally reject the theory of continental drift?
Most scientists originally reject the theory of continental drift since it did clearly explain continents would move. This is a theory that has been established by Wegener and did not get good support initially.
What was the super-continent in the continental drift hypothesis called?
Pangaea or Pangea was the super-continent in the continental drift hypothesis.
Why did most scientist reject Wegener hypothesis of continental drift?
Because he could not explain how the continents moved.
How many times has continental drift occurred?
Continental drift has occurred multiple times throughout geologic history, with supercontinents forming and breaking apart. The most recent supercontinent was Pangaea, which began to break apart around 175 million years ago, leading to the current distribution of continents.
Did Wladimir Koppen develop the hypothesis of continental drift?
No, the hypothesis that continents 'drift' was first put forward by Abraham Ortelius in 1596 and was fully developed by Alfred Wegener in 1912. Koppen is most widely known for his development of a climate classification system. More information follows on the Related Link listed below:
The most conclusive proof for continent drift was provided by?
The most conclusive proof for continental drift was provided by the discovery of seafloor spreading and magnetic striping on the ocean floor. This evidence showed that the Earth's continents are moving apart from each other due to the movement of tectonic plates.
What force of nature is responsible for continental drift?
Most definantly the convection
Why were most scientists disagreeing with Alfred Wegeners continental drift theory?
There was no evidence to prove it
Why most geologists rejected Alfred wegeners idea of continental drift?
dont ask me freak
Why did most scientists originally reject the theory of continental drift?
Most scientists originally reject the theory of continental drift since it did clearly explain continents would move. This is a theory that has been established by Wegener and did not get good support initially.
Does having a dowagers hump mean you have osteoporosis?
It is not conclusive, irrefutable proof but, most would accept that the presence of a dowager's hump it is a very strong indication that you are osteoporotic.
What were Charles Darwin's contributions to Wegeners theory of continental drift?
Most people actually state that Darwin beat Wegener to the theory of continental drift as he mentioned in most of his studies about the continents drifting apart and fitting together.
Why was Alfred Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift not taken seriously by most geologists?
Alfred Wegener's hypothesis of continental drift was not taken seriously by most geologists because he lacked a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move. Additionally, the idea was considered radical at the time and went against the prevailing scientific beliefs. It wasn't until the development of the theory of plate tectonics in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas gained widespread acceptance.
Who made fun of Alfred Wegener's Drift Theory?
Many geologists and scientists at the time made fun of Alfred Wegener's Drift Theory, dismissing it as implausible and unscientific. Wegener's theory of continental drift proposed that the continents were once connected and drifted apart over time, which was not widely accepted until much later when the theory of plate tectonics was formulated.
Do most plankton swim or drift?
Most drift.
Monotremes and marsupials are limited to the Australian region because of?
Continental drift is a significant factor in why monotremes and most (not all) marsupials are found in Australia. This has resulted in isolation.
Hypothesis that the continents have moved slowly to their current locations?
The theories of continental drift and plate tectonics. These are relatively new ideas; when I was young, they were still fairly controversial. But as the evidence has accumulated, most people have become convinced that these are valid explanations of how things came to be as they are. Just remember that the next time somebody says that something is "settled science"; the science of any discipline is NEVER settled.
