The fact is that no scientist claims the planet has not warmed. It has by well over 10 degrees C in the past 10,000 years. What some science experts claim is that man is causing this issue by the burning of fossil fuels.
Until 1996, almost no scientist even claimed this. What was claimed, in the beginning, is that man may be a contributor to global warming. The reason for this was the fact that man started recording temperatures globally around 1850.
Two things were occurring at the same moment in this time period. Technology was really starting to move forward. The Steam engine came out and man started using fossil fuels. This was also the lowest temp period of what is called the mini ice age. Thus temps started to rise again.
The result of these two things occurring at the same time meant we had two events whose data correlated. As technology moved forward so did the rise in temps. Over this time period we did see a rise in temp of about 0.66 degrees.
Two occurring at the same time does not honestly or logically mean they are connected though. (It also does not mean to say they are NOT connected). At this same time their was a correlated decrease in the number pirate ships. This does not imply a relationship their either (although it could). A decrease in pirates does not mean an increase in temps. They corresponded, but were not related. We needed to determine f temp was related to human use of fossil fuel. Further study was needed.
This created an industry known as the green movement. There are now hundreds of scientists that rely on this movement for their funding. Results now correlate to the side of the argument that provides the most funding. The conclusion of this argument does mean a serious loss of income to many science agencies like the GISS and the IPCC.
The facts do not support man being a sole or major cause of warming. Almost no scientist claims this. What many do claim is that man could be a contributor. We know that almost all of the current warming trend occurred prior to man burning his first chuck of coal. (11 degrees total warming in past 10,000 years and 0.66 warming since 1850).
Interesting little tidbit: Most of our 0.66 degrees of warming that we have seen since man did start using fossil fuels occurred prior to World War 2. The planet then spent a few decades cooling down during a period of high fuel use (1960's and 70's). So much so that the science experts believed that man was causing serious cooling of the planet. Since then 0.2 degrees of this warming has occurred over the 1938 level, despite a sharp spike in fossil fuel use.
We also know that 1998 was the record warmest year and the IPCC claims we will see less warming for awhile. The term is now called climate change to allow for further funding despite the fact we do not see any warming trends globally. This allows for us to debate localized trends and ignore data that proves the world has cycles.
What specific issues?
Some science groups claim a decrease in rain, others claim an increase
Some say water Rise of 30 feet, others 12 inches (over 150 years)
The bottom line is that no matter what changes you will see on the planet, some group will claim it to be caused by global warming.
A:Two thousand five hundred (2500) scientists from the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) believe:There are some scientists who disagree:
See the list (and add to it) at the Wikipedia link below.
_______________________________________________________________
There are a total of roughly 3500 individuals that worked with the IPCC report on climate change. 53 of these people were science experts, not 2500. Over 20 of these experts have sued the IPCC for changing the context of their statement and drawing invalid conclusions.
The IPCC has missed virtually every projection they have ever made AND the modeling programs they use have been unable to repeat current events from past climates. There are over 100 "black box" mods needed to make the modeling systems they have used work. With enough false variables any modeling system will give you whatever you desire. Elephants can fly with enough false information provided to your program.
Just to show you how massively non science based the politics of this issue has become. We even have Physicists resigning from the " American Physical Society " because the science does not support the idea of man induced global warming yet the debate has been settled according to politicians. (attached link)
just like everyone else disagree's on other important things.like war
The overwhelming consensus among climate scientists is that global warming is real and primarily caused by human activities. While there may be a small minority of scientists who question the extent or causes of global warming, the consensus and evidence supporting the reality of climate change are robust.
Global warming and climate chang
Not necessarily, as belief in evolution and belief in global warming don't really have anything to do with each other. That said, a person who believes in evolution is probably more likely to believe in global warming, as they tend to listen to what scientists say, and scientists are the biggest advocates for global warming being real.
Yes, global warming is a widely accepted scientific theory supported by a vast majority of climate scientists worldwide. The overwhelming consensus is that human activities, such as the burning of fossil fuels, are a significant driver of the current global warming trend.
Approximately 97 of climate scientists believe in global warming.
I do not have personal opinions. However, scientific consensus supports the idea that human activities are contributing to global warming, which is causing significant impacts on the environment. Addressing climate change is crucial for the well-being of our planet and future generations.
Approximately 97 of scientists believe in man-made global warming.
According to multiple studies, less than 3 of scientists do not believe in global warming.
The overwhelming majority of scientists agree that global warming is real. Multiple studies have shown that around 97 of climate scientists support the consensus that human activities are causing global warming.
just like everyone else disagree's on other important things.like war
Yes, approximately 97 of scientists agree that global warming is happening and is primarily caused by human activities.
Yes, the majority of scientists agree that global warming is happening and that it is having a significant impact on the environment.
The consensus among scientists is that global warming is real and supported by 97 of them.
Because it is GLOBAL, not local warming.
The work of 15 climate scientists is helping to educate the public about the overwhelming scientific evidence for human-caused global warming.
Yes, approximately 97 of climate scientists agree that global warming is happening and is primarily caused by human activities.