It depends on the species. If fish were to disappear then it could have a large adverse effect on the ecosystem. However, in many cases it could negatively effect the ecosystem.
Well, Deers and Rabbits cant live in a pond ecosystem because they are forest animals and also bats. So any forest animal you can think of mostly cant live in a pond ecosystem
If a species is ecologically dominant, it dominates the biomass of the ecosystem (think big dipterocarp trees dominating a rainforest). These organisms influence the ecosystem due to their huge size or enormous number. Other organisms rely on these species and removing them often has a domino effect of local extinctions.
i can only think of one and that is the snowy owl
No, the carrying capacity varies among species in an ecosystem due to differences in resource requirements, reproductive rates, and ecological roles. Each species has a unique set of needs and interactions with its environment, which influences how many individuals can be sustained. Additionally, factors such as competition, predation, and environmental conditions can further affect the carrying capacity for different species.
I think you mean who does belong? Everyone and everything belongs to the ecosystem.
I think you mean a beech forest. Beech is a species of tree. A beech forest is a forest where most of the trees are beeches.
The soil in a forest is called forest soil. It is usually rich in organic matter like decomposing leaves, twigs, and plant material, which provide nutrients for the plants and organisms living in the forest ecosystem. Forest soil is usually well-draining and supports a diverse range of plant and animal species.
Well, Deers and Rabbits cant live in a pond ecosystem because they are forest animals and also bats. So any forest animal you can think of mostly cant live in a pond ecosystem
Natural succession typically occurs in the following order: prairie, followed by marsh, then forest. This sequence is based on changes in environmental conditions and species interactions as the ecosystem matures over time.
If a species is ecologically dominant, it dominates the biomass of the ecosystem (think big dipterocarp trees dominating a rainforest). These organisms influence the ecosystem due to their huge size or enormous number. Other organisms rely on these species and removing them often has a domino effect of local extinctions.
If an ecosystem lost all its plant species, it would disrupt the food chain as plants are primary producers. This would lead to a cascade effect, impacting herbivores, predators, and ultimately the entire ecosystem. Nutrient cycles would also be disrupted, affecting soil health and ecosystem stability.
The answer I think would be ecosystem diversity. If this is wrong, I am sorry. ^_^
they can usually be found in tall trees or plants that are close to rivers or ponds. A good example of this is an ecosystem especially a rain forest
i can only think of one and that is the snowy owl
yes you can find dragonflies in the rainforest
There is no answer to that question, I'm sorry. New species are found all the time, so it is impossible to keep on track of how many animals have scientists found. They think, that probably over 90 % of all world's species are not yet found.
Some species that share habitat with elephants include rhinoceroses, giraffes, zebras, lions, and various bird species. They all coexist in savannas and grasslands where they depend on a similar ecosystem for survival.